Feedback from New Page Review process[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thank you for creating this well-written and researched page on a notable World War II-era Austrian nurse. I appreciate your contribution to the history of this period.

Ppt91talk 19:24, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 00:42, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Stromberger
Maria Stromberger

Created by Thebiguglyalien (talk). Self-nominated at 17:21, 5 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Maria Stromberger; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Maria Stromberger/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ppt91 (talk · contribs) 19:13, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


I am happy to review this interesting article and hope to have the first batch of feedback by the end of this week. Looking forward to working together! Ppt91talk 19:13, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Overall, as expected of this editor, the article is well-written, detailed, and supported by reliable historical scholarship. My comments mostly have to do with providing more context regarding World War II and the Holocaust and clarifying certain aspects of her life and career.

Lead[edit]

Early life[edit]

More soon! Ppt91talk 21:03, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Auschwitz resistance[edit]

General comment: it looks like Auschwitz resistance is only discussed in the third paragraph; maybe it could be a subsection for a more general section name "Auschwitz concentration camp" with "Resistance movement at Auschwitz (1943-1944)" as subsection title

Later life and death[edit]

Images[edit]

User:Thebiguglyalien Thanks for your patience, putting this on hold for now awaiting your comments. Ppt91talk 19:36, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Thebiguglyalien Incorrect ping earlier; fixing. :) Ppt91talk 19:36, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ppt91, I've made most of the changes. I replied to a few of them above. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 21:30, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Thebiguglyalien I'll try to look through and reply by tomorrow. In the meantime, I wanted to share a few of my own finds, which I hope you will find helpful:
  • Wontor-Cichy, Teresa. "Stanisław Kłodziński: Auschwitz survivor, medical practitioner, social activist, and journalist (1918–1990)." Medical Review Auschwitz: Medicine Behind the Barbed Wire. (Conference Proceedings 2022). 19–21 September 2022, Kraków, Poland: 11-24. A short but interesting paragraph about her professional title etc pp. 18-19
  • on a related note, the source above cites a 1962 article from Przegląd Lekarski – Oświęcim (Medical Review Auschwitz) by Stanisław Kłodziński (former Auschwitz inmate who is the subject of the article above). It is also cited in the Nursing History Review source you used. I searched the footnote in Polish and it turns out that archival issues of the journal have been digitized in 2017 and are available for free on their website. The article is five pages in length titled Kłodziński, Stanisław (1962) “Maria Stromberger,” Przegląd Lekarski – Oświęcim. pp. 102-107. It's in Polish and I only skimmed it, but it looks fascinating and is extremely detailed; the first two pages, for instance, contain information ranging from prosaic (she and her sister lived at Heldendankstrasse 15 in Bregens) to historically important (stating that she was never part of the SS and never joined NSDAP, providing specific details on what she heard about the conditions at Auschwitz, and identifying the last name of the SS doctor, Dr. Entress, who hired her at the camp infirmary). If you do not read Polish, I'll be happy to look over it more carefully either tomorrow or later this week and let you know if there is anything else that might be useful for the article.
  • also, the German book by Harald Walser was released in Polish this past summer and there are excerpts online, which can be Google translated, but without page numbers, so I think maybe it should just be included as further reading
Ppt91talk 01:02, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ppt91, so where are we at on this review? Is there anything I still need to do before the article meets the criteria? Thebiguglyalien (talk) 23:33, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Thebiguglyalien I never heard back from you regarding the additional sources I located, so I assumed you still needed some time and/or were preoccupied with other projects. I don't anticipate there being any significant/structural issues and the article looks good overall, but I would like to look through the article carefully again before passing. I have been quite swamped with stuff IRL, but I will let you know if I have any questions/comments by the end of the weekend latest. Thanks, Ppt91talk 19:06, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ppt91 I did end up getting distracted by other stuff. But yeah, checking in to see where we're at. As always, no rush. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 16:12, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Thebiguglyalien I so appreciate your patience here. It's been non-stop with several deadlines IRL and I, too, got distracted. I will do my absolute best to add any outstanding comments/edits by the EOD (EST) tomorrow. It's a great article, and an important one at that, so I just want to do my due diligence. :) Ppt91talk 18:31, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Thebiguglyalien There are a few details that I was able to find in secondary sources that could be added for precision, but these do not stand in the way of GA. The article is sufficient for GA, so I am going to go ahead and pass. It's been a pleasure working together. Ppt91talk 14:03, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.