GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jclemens (talk · contribs) 01:48, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | |
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | No issues seen. |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | No issues noted, but see below for presentation concern. |
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | None noted. |
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | None found through automated tool |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | Fine. |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | Fine. |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | I don't see any commentary from people who aren't enamored of her work. Does such exist? If so, we should consider DUE weight. |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | No issues noted. |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | "File:Meinstein – Nadia Kaabi-Linke – aerial with person.jpg" and "Walk the Line, 2015 02.jpg" have pending OTRS permissions. I don't have immediate access to OTRS, will be following up on this. |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Frankly, they could easily stand to be larger, since this article is about a visual artist. |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. | Accepted on the basis that final OTRS approvals for the fair-use images are pending, and that a good-faith effort has turned up no particular criticism of this artist's work. |
Overall, the prose looks in rather good condition, without much polishing needed. Jclemens (talk) 02:10, 4 August 2016 (UTC)