This article was nominated for deletion on 30 April 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The piece about Steam Railway and the Railway Magazine editors being on the forum may not be correct at all if a recent (undone) edit is to be believed. Can someone confirm? Added : 07:12, 18 January 2010 86.25.212.226
I can confirm that both people are still members of the forum. 80.89.94.28 (talk) 14:36, 19 January 2010 (UTC) Its doubtful they are still members of the forum. If they are they don't seem to contribute, publicise their presence or promote their activity in an identifiable manner.
More useless edits, I have just checked the link provided, 03-01-2010 11:53 AM was the last active date, not the date specified. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.89.94.28 (talk) 15:15, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
It is my intention to rewrite this page in a neutral, unbiased style. I do not believe it to be far away from this, as it seems largely neutral to me to start with. Bluebellnutter (talk) 21:30, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
At the moment it reads more like a hatchet job than an encyclopedia article! Far too many personal opinions and unsupported statements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.153.12.191 (talk) 16:34, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Right, the aims I have for the article are as follows.
First, aim to sort out the current page to fit with the concerns outlined at the top of the page with regards to the notability of the company and to seek more external references. If anyone can think of or find any, that'd be brilliant.
Second, to bring the page into the WikiProject Trains, as well as any other similar projects within Wikipedia.
Thirdly, a copy of the logo would be good.
Also, I think the article needs generally expanding on and improve the article. Bluebellnutter (talk) 17:55, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Logo changed to the current company logo. Rather that the image previously used.Nationalpreservation (talk) 11:35, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Active members on National Preservation, every year the forum has more than doubled it's active membership.
Year Ending | New Members |
---|---|
2005 | 400 |
2006 | 1158 |
2007 | 2182 |
2008 | N/A |
2009 | Current Year |
This article reads like an advert for a website. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.7.225.250 (talk) 10:25, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
I suspect that some of the moderator staff are editing this website.
Please remember to sign your contributions. RGCorris (talk) 16:47, 22 January 2010 (UTC)