North Carolina Highway 133 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 9, 2021. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: North Carolina Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Low-importance). U.S. Roads: State highways / North Carolina Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Topics  U.S. state highways   Locations  North Carolina   This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it. This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists. This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Special routes of U.S. Route 17#US 17-1|US 17-1]] Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

If you might have noticed there are junctions but now thing to tell people they are junctions. Can anyone help me with that. Thanks--Ncchild (talk) 01:20, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't understand the question. In the Infobox, they should list only major junctions (i.e. Interstates and other major highways); a "junction list" or "major intersections" (the second I dislike using) is a more detail of every numbered highway and major road connecting to the route. The best I can suggest is to see how others do it. --WashuOtaku (talk) 04:35, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It means if you look their is no Junctions: beside them. --Ncchild (talk) 16:43, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I dont understand how this is a stub. It has tons on Information.--Ncchild (talk) 16:45, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

At the time it was last assessed, it was a stub with only an RD section. USRD has a fairly simple way to assess articles. There is the Big 3: RD, Hist. RJL. If an article has only 1 of the Big 3, it's a stub. If it has 2, it's a start. If it has all three, it's a C or B; we look at the quality of the references and writing to determine if an article should be a B instead of a C. If any section is in really bad shape, we can skip counting it for assessment. Since there are all 3 sections, and they're in ok shape, I've reassessed this as a B. Imzadi 1979 → 22:38, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:North Carolina Highway 133/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 16:49, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• " parallels the" is that the same as "runs parallel to the"?
• Is there a reason US 74 and US 76 etc aren't linked?
• I would imagine the length of the road would be suitable for inclusion in the lead?
• Avoid SHOUTING in ref titles (e.g. ROBERT HOWE)
• What's a "trumpet interchange"?
• "S. Thomas Rhodes Bridge" linked in the table but not the prose.
• "cross the Northeast Cape Fear River via" overlink.
• "Isabel Holmes Bridge" or "Isabel Stellings Holmes Bridge"? And the first isn't linked, the second is (albeit red)...
• "is concurrent along NC 133 " I would say "runs concurrently with NC 133" but I guess it's horses for courses.
• "parallel the Cape Fear River and" again is that "run parallel with"? And the river is overlinked.
• "to Orton Plantation in" overlinked.
• "concurrently along NC 211 for " overlinked.
• "modern-route " no need to hyphenate.
• "the Brunswick River and Northeast Cape Fear River. " both overlinked.
• " the Isabel Holmes Bridge, where " link it (albeit red) first time.
• "with US 117. US 117 and" repetitive.
• "towards Wrightsboro" overlinked.
• " a diverging diamond interchange was completed" overlinked.
• ""in Leland" overlinked.
• "0.48" in the table, keep conversions to same level of accuracy.
• Ref 5 (for example) a spaced hyphen needs to be replaced by spaced en-dash.

That's it for me, so it's on hold for now. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 16:32, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that I have fixed all of the problems except for the 0.48 in the table. Personally, I'm not sure that I can change that, it is an automatic conversion completed by the template.--Ncchild (talk) 17:47, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, fair enough. It looks silly sticking out like that but I appreciate it's not your fault. Perhaps the project could add a parameter to the template to allow decimal places to be selected, but I doubt that'll happen any time soon. I'll pass this to GA. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 18:43, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]