This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
|||||||||||
|
(written by the author of this article) --Zutam (talk) 11:41, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Good suggestion, thanks. Actually the PLL is not an algorithm but an electronic component or module or system; anyway I hope the change I made addresses your question - the Multibit PLL is just another type of phase locked loop, you can see there further details.
--Zutam (talk) 22:25, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I am also a bit supprised on multi-bit PLLs! In literature, conferences, patents, etc. there is much more discussion about fractional-N (or sigma-delta) PLLs than on multi-bit, but the separation is not clear, e.g. some author talk about multi-bit fractional-N PLLs! There is some overlap, but there could be also significant difference. It could be that multi-bit is meant more general, but on the other hand there is little usage of the word multi-bit PLL! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.131.238.28 (talk) 12:19, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Edit wars on style are unacceptable. It also is bad Wikiette. Unless someone objects (with specific arguments), I intend to return the empty spaces.
--Zutam (talk) 00:20, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
If you do not want your writing to be edited, used, and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here. All text that you did not write yourself, except brief excerpts, must be available under terms consistent with Wikipedia's Terms of Use before you submit it.
Questions:
1. Can you cite resources in support of your claim "we cannot use copyrighted images on Wikipedia"?
2. Line 8 your edit: why do you insert irrelevant and incorrect statements about "all-digital-PLL"?
3. You add an irrelevant discussion about all-digital-PLL, but delete my definition of this subject, which is relevant as background for this article - why?
4. Line 8 your edit: why did you delete my definitions? they are useful to a reader and relevant to the article.
5. Line 17, relevant material was deleted - why?
--Zutam (talk) 07:08, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Following is an example of WP use of copyrighted pictures.
" File:Template-info.svg From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search File File history File links Global file usage
Template-info.svg (SVG file, nominally 117 × 60 pixels, file size: 24 KB)
This image rendered as PNG in other sizes: 200px, 500px, 1000px, 2000px.
This is a file from the Wikimedia Commons. The description on its description page there is shown below. Commons is a freely licensed media file repository. You can help.
This high-risk image, which is widely used on Wikimedia projects, has been protected to prevent vandalism. [Italics added by zutam].
Please discuss changes on the talk page or request unprotection.
Summary Description Template-info.svg English: Template information icon Date 9 March 2007(2007-03-09)
Source Own work, based on Image:Gtk-dialog-info.svg
Author User:Quarl, David Vignoni (Image:Gtk-dialog-info.svg)
Permission (Reusing this file) See below. Other versions Derivative works of this file:
Template-info-subst.png
Licensing I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation " —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zutam (talk • contribs) 11:09, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Related articles can be found using for example the following keywords:
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.65.28.233 (talk) 18:06, 18 July 2010 (UTC)