This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Who is Manu Joseph and why is an arbitrary case of criticism notable in the biography of a living person? This case of satirical comments is not widely reported or culturally or historically notable. This seems like a slanderous attack on the living person in this biographical article. Alberun (talk) 19:19, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
That link about something he wrote in NYT about farmers ("In India, Farmers Face a Terrifying Crisis") is from 2018. The farmers' protests against BJP have begun in 2020. How can he be supporting them from before they even began unless he has been involved in them? MumbaiMedia (talk) 18:03, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello everyone. You may have noticed I gutted this article and edited it so it aligns with Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biography. The number of non-reliable sources used in this article is overwhelming and they need to be replaced. Primary sources should be used sparingly, including things like op eds he has written. Whomever is interested in this subject - please re-examine the sourcing and do some research into replacing them with as many reliable secondary sources as possible.
He's won a lot. It's evident. I highly suggest someone remove the cruft - remove the less notable awards and stick to the big guns. While Sainath hasn't had as robust of a career of Noam Chomsky, I suggest you use the Chomsky article for inspiration - the sections, the sourcing, tone, etc. Do you see every single award and chair he's held in his article? No. Think about content that an encyclopedia cares about - not a resume. Does the average reader care about every single award ever given that they've never heard of? No.
Here's something I removed from the article. Again, this is Wikipedia, not a resume. We don't need TWO sections devoted to awards. They should be dotted in his career section chronologically. So, think about (1) there are no citations; (2) does the reader care? Is this encyclopedic? You can decide, but here you go:
In 1984 he was a Distinguished International Scholar at the University of Western Ontario and in 1988 a visiting lecturer at Moscow University. He was also a Distinguished International Professional at Iowa University (Fall 1998), the first McGill Fellow and lecturer at Trinity College, Hartford, Connecticut (Spring 2002), and visiting professor at University of California, Berkeley at the Graduate School of Journalism (Fall 2008). He has participated in many international initiatives on communications such as the second and third round table on Global Communications sponsored by the UNESCO (1990 and 1991) and in the UNHCR sponsored World Information Campaign on Human Rights (1991).
Another uncited claim. I would not state "he is the only" without having multiple reliable secondary sources to back it up. Here's what I removed - most of this repeats what is already in the article. Use as you wish:
He is also the only journalist to have won awards from his newspaper's rivals in the north, south, east and west of the country: from the Indian Express[1] in Delhi, the southern edition of the Indian Express now known as the New Indian Express,[2] the Statesman in Kolkata and the fellowship from the Times of India[3] based in Mumbai.
Just remember - this is an encyclopedia. Not an academic resume. Also please use Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biography for reference and keep it neutral, boring as hell, and avoid using primary sources as much as possible, only when absolutely necessary.
Thanks everyone for your edits and happy new year. Missvain (talk) 18:08, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
References
Based on my 14+ years of writing biographies, I think it's acceptable to have a notable stable or quote about the subject in the lead. I moved this one from the body to the lead in my overhaul:
The economist Amartya Sen called him "one of the world's great experts on famine and hunger".[1]
While that is primary source, an interview with Sainath, the quote comes from the Times of India. For example, I just overhauled the article about Barbara Tropp, who was called - while she was alive - the Julia Child of Chinese food. I included it in the lead.
I'd like to know if any contributors here oppose or support having the Sen quote in the lead - or anywhere else in this article. Please comment below and we'll proceed accordingly based on consensus. Thank you. (cc: User:MumbaiMedia who removed my addition of it to the lead). Missvain (talk) 18:27, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
References