Accuracy[edit]

I'm not sure myself, but a cursory search brought to my attention the possible inaccuracies of the Wiki page. According to this: [1] the pledge is slightly different--as I do not know for sure, I just wanted to post this here and see if anyone else can confirm or deny to help keep this accurate. Thanks for any help! DietFoodstamp (talk) 05:26, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If the English translation is accurate, then the title of the page is not. The text gives a pledge to the country; the title claims a pledge to a flag. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.250.255.199 (talk) 01:02, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Romanization?[edit]

Can someone please add a line with the Romanization, as well? Thank you. AdderUser (talk) 15:11, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of South Korea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ((Sourcecheck))).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:38, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semantic question[edit]

Would not the language of the former pledge be better described as "racialist" than "racist"? 72.105.3.187 (talk) 00:53, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Strictly speaking they basically mean the same thing, but agree that the latter carries some extra baggage/connotations these days. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 00:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]