In the course of looking up this company in Google, I stumbled upon its Wikipedia article and, in turn, this talk page discussion to merge. There is
consensus here to merging
Nikolay Storonsky into
Revolut as nominator
Kashmiri's assertion that Mr. Storonsky likely fails our
general notability guideline for people was unchallenged. Moreover, there was concurrence (support) from two other editors, over the course of more than a year, that the nominator's policy-based rationale that notability is
not inherited by virtue of having founded a company (whose
notability for corporations has also not yet been established; certainly,
as written, this corporation fails both
WP:GNG and
WP:CORPDEPTH; in terms of
potential sources, it may well fail one or both required tests). Only one participating editor opposed the merge, not on
policy-based grounds, which is fine since Wikipedia notionally has
no rules, but, even if we were to equally weight the arguments against the other policy-based reasons (which I did), there was consensus
against allowing Mr. Storonsky to have a standalone article.
Doug Mehus T·
C 14:58, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]