![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 14 January 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This page was proposed for deletion by 68.165.77.51 (talk · contribs) in the past with the comment: Notability of this fictional character not established due to lack of significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject It was contested by 3:21:14:20: is key (talk · contribs) |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Since the proposed deletion was contested as documented above, I am following the WP:Articles for deletion process and nominating it for deletion. The reason remains the same: Notability of this fictional character is not established due to lack of significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. 68.165.77.175 (talk) 06:53, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article, File:Robert California.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 15 February 2012
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Robert California.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:25, 15 February 2012 (UTC) |
Nothing but idle speculation without one reference to media which discusses it. Shouldn't it just be removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.175.24.227 (talk) 16:53, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Why the heck does James Spader's "Robert California" character garner a bigger page than his Boston Legal alter-ego? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nemmers (talk • contribs) 23:48, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Does this title make sense? Should it be split in to one section for each season? Admittedly, the section for Season 7 would be very short. Alternately, since he only stars in one season, should this section be given a title that shows that this covers the character's entire appearance on the show?
Omgouda (talk) 02:46, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
This was one off-handed comment to Andy on a phone call. It’s just a Doors reference, not a true alter ego worth notating in the introductory paragraph. This should be removed, it’s just silly. Bob Kazamakis, though, might actually be his name (in the sentence preceding, he tells Andy, “you don’t even know my name,” so it’s plausible this is what he meant), so that should be kept. Deliusfan (talk) 06:39, 21 November 2023 (UTC)