Internet popularity

A Nightcore edit of this song has become popular through the game "Osu!", a clip of someone playing that "beatmap" and that clip beeing featured in on the "PewDiePie" YouTube-Channel but I don't know if and how it would be appropiate to add this. Sorry for just pushing this away. --LonleyGhost (talk) 18:11, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

About removing the section "Internet phenomenon"

@IceWelder has removed the section "Internet phenomenon" completely stating:

Poorly sourced and written sensationally; this is not KnowYourMeme

I have several objection to the removal. First, I did cite sources to every claim. If it said

The first known occurrence of the nightcore version was an osu! map that was published on the 24th of July, 2011.

[1] would be cited. If you see a lack of citation, please add the needed citations. If you see poor citation, please improve on the citation.

Second, if you think it is written sensationally, you can improve on it rather than cutting out an entire section. Third, this is not KnowYourMeme I agree, I did not touch it when writing the section. However Wikipedia does contain and discuss internet culture, which the Nightcore Rockefeller Street remix is part of and thus the information that was cut out is relevant to the article. And lastly, as far as I'm concerned, Wikipedia is a collaborative project, if there is a part that is badly formatted, badly written or badly cited, but still contains relevant information (which in this case, it did), it should be improved on collaboratively.

Also, the section contained some moved information from the original introduction, which has not been moved back, but rather, cut out with the rest.

Radonafoot (talk) Radonafoot (talk) 16:26, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The sensationalism would have been salvageable, sure, but the referencing was not. The source you link here is a random osu! map; nowhere does it say that it was the "first known occurrence of the nightcore version", nor would it be a reliable source for such a claim. Claims need to be verifiable and cannot be based on original research. I did search for sources but found none that could be considered reliable - indicating that the version may not be notable - which left WP:TNT as the better option. When reliable sources are found, the content can always be restored and fixed, but any added material must be verifiable and properly referenced. The reason I stated that "this is not KnowYourMeme" is that the song's entry there (as well as most other entries) follow the same pattern: "The first occurrence of X was Y", using only Y as the source, even though Y does not (and cannot) claim to be the first instance of X. Regards, IceWelder [✉] 17:18, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Passed. Skyshiftertalk 22:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Rockefeller Street/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Skyshifter (talk · contribs) 00:11, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


As an osu! player, I can't lose this opportunity. Skyshiftertalk 00:11, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

General comments

Infobox

Lead

Left another comment up there, but the lead seems good so far. I'll hopefully finish this in the next few days. Skyshiftertalk 01:49, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Background and composition

Critical reception

Again I'm not an expert in Eurovision articles. However, it seems that this section should be moved after the Eurovision Song Contest section, or some of its text should be moved. It is strange to present the reception of the Eurovision performance before content about the performance itself is shown in the article.

Other comments

Hey, I'm back. I decided to do copyedits to the article that you may revert if you disagree. I believe most prose issues are resolved. However, I'd recommend sending the article to WP:GOCE after this review to guarantee the prose is in good shape, as I am not fluent in English, so it's possible I could've missed something. However, I tried my best to fix the prose issues.

Spot-check

Will pick a few sources randomly. Do note I don't know any Estonian, so for Estonian sources, I'll basically be checking against an automatic translated version.

 On hold Skyshiftertalk 18:37, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, here are a few more spot-checks since quite a few of them failed above. If too many of them fail again, a full spot-check on all sources will probably be needed, which will take more time. Skyshiftertalk 18:50, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1, 2, 7, 3, down to ✓ Passing this article. (not cringe at all...) Skyshiftertalk 22:41, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
  1. ^ "Rockefeller Street (Nightcore Mix) -Getter Jaani". osu!. osuplayer111 "Andrea".((cite web)): CS1 maint: url-status (link)
Categories