[edit]

Are there still concerns that this article is written "like an advertisement"? I see no discussion about it here, even in the archives, and I don't get the feeling of an ad from the article itself, so I am inclined to remove this tag, unless there is a reasoned objection. Elizium23 (talk) 23:25, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried to remove as much of it as I can find, but it's still in need of cleanup to remove wording that seems to be promoting the band, rather than describing it. Friginator (talk) 00:02, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Legend 3:2[edit]

It was released aug 5 2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.118.205.78 (talk) 00:20, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The official website claims that it is a fraud and a crime. What is your source, and who are we going to believe? Elizium23 (talk) 01:10, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There is a news article giving a markedly different viewpoint from the official website. I think this story is just unfolding. Let's wait for more coverage by secondary sources because SM's self-published source is not usable for claims against third parties such as their record company. Elizium23 (talk) 05:30, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Saviour Machine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ((Sourcecheck))).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:51, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Saviour Machine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:30, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]