This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Trains Low‑importance Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Philadelphia Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Philadelphia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhiladelphiaWikipedia:WikiProject PhiladelphiaTemplate:WikiProject PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Pennsylvania Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Cycling Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Hiking trails (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hiking trails, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Hiking trailsWikipedia:WikiProject Hiking trailsTemplate:WikiProject Hiking trailsHiking trails articles

The recent headwaters-toward-confluence overhaul by Krimpet was a good idea.

Here is a minor thing that I should look at more later. Multi-use trail currently redirects to Segregated cycle facilities, which (upon scanning) seems to be all about bicycling and not about walking, jogging, hiking, rollerblading, and other trail uses. (I lack time to read it line-by-line at the moment.) I may reinsert the line here about all the things "multi-use" entails (not just bicycling). But for now I really need to stop indulging my WP habit and get back to work! Lumbercutter 14:04, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I figured it would be good to go west-east, following the standard of highway articles and also providing more opportunity for expansion as the remainder of the segments are completed. You made a good point about multi-use trail redirecting to segregated cycle facilities; I edited the redirect to point to Trail#Multi-use trails, which while sparse right now gives a better description of the multi-use nature and could be expanded. Krimpet 14:43, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Support the article merge. --evrik 16:09, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Support, Schuylkill Banks and the Schuylkill River Trail are one in the same south of the Art Museum. Krimpet 16:56, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Support merge. —Lumbercutter 17:11, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Support merge. 1312020Wikicop 23:38, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose. The Schuykill Banks article does not capture the entire developement project topic (see the external link there). If the article were expanded, it would not be a merge candidate. Unless there is an SRDC article. --J Clear 13:21, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose. It makes no sense to combine the 140 mile entirety of the trail with a page featuring the 27mile Phoenixville-Philadelphia section. 9:56, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

I just added the following: "On many maps and street atlases, and on some of the trail's signage, the segment between Philadelphia and Valley Forge is still identified by the name Philadelphia–Valley Forge Trail." This is notable. I know that some editors are going to want to delete this because it's an outdated name. But it's important to realize that people who are unfamiliar with the trail and the area (which is a big reason for reading this article in the first place) are going to see the name "Philadelphia–Valley Forge Trail" on maps and even on some of the trail's signage itself, and it's a good idea to clarify for them that yes, it's the same trail. — Lumbercutter 17:10, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seems reasonable. But you forgot to dot the i and create this redirect Philadelphia–Valley Forge Trail, which is SOP when an article covers a topic with multiple names.--J Clear 18:23, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea. Thanks. — Lumbercutter 22:27, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

While it's notable, and I can personally confirm that I've seen this name is in use, it's important to find a reliable source that confirms this. Krimpet (talk) 22:31, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea. Done. Thanks. — Lumbercutter 23:26, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Several otherwise good sources are claiming the SRT has a US Department of Interior National Recreation Trail designation. However a search of the NRT database shows only the small portion of the trail in Schuylkill Banks is so designated. On the other hand, the Schuylkill River Water Trail is listed as a NRT for the the whole river. --J Clear (talk) 12:23, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On many maps, such as Google, the West River Drive trail is marked "Schuylkill River Trail" and the Kelly Drive is marked "Schuylkill River Trail - Valley Forge to Philadelphia," so is the trail on both sides of the river, joining together at the east end of the West River Drive Bridge? I am asking, since bridges show what they cross over, and perhaps I should be showing both for several bridges over the Schuylkill in Fairmount Park.

See this Google Map, which shows trails on both sides of the river.--DThomsen8 (talk) 00:01, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if both sides are trails, where do they split upstream? Perhaps at the Falls Bridge?--DThomsen8 (talk) 00:04, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• In case anyone's still wondering ... yes, a trail does run along the west side of the river between the West River Drive and Falls Bridges. That segment is not shown on the official printed Schuylkill River Trail map (2015 version anyway) so maybe it's not an official segment; however, the west side trail is included on the Schuylkill Banks online map. The west side trail is paved but much more bumpy (tree roots) and less travelled by cyclists than the east side trail. For recreational purposes, the smooth road on the west side of the park is barricaded by police for about a 3 mile stretch on weekend afternoons till 5pm from spring to fall (the entire 4 miles of roadway from bridge-to-bridge are blocked till noon). During those times, motor vehicles may only enter via Montgomery Drive, proceeding @10mph to parking lots. Brian W. Schaller (talk) 04:15, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.  I just approved this article and found it does not really fit exactly with this article.  Perhaps Schuylkill River Trail should become a project so that it is cohesive in content and style? :- ) DCS 19:53, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to see a map. --:- ) DCS 20:00, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Schuylkill River Trail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add ((cbignore)) after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add ((nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot)) to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060622055334/http://www.manayunkcanal.org:80/index.htm to http://www.manayunkcanal.org/index.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090527003028/http://www.philly.com:80/inquirer/front_page/20090521_Fairmount_Park_Commission_OKs_acquisition_of_Schuylkill_land_parcels.html to http://www.philly.com/inquirer/front_page/20090521_Fairmount_Park_Commission_OKs_acquisition_of_Schuylkill_land_parcels.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:52, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What are the other trails in the image? The area that I am most familiar with on that map doesn't have a trail - there is no trail along Baltimore Ave - unless you count a crappy painted-on lane, and there is nothing from Baltimore Ave. along Cobbs Creek, so the map is inaccurate, and I suspect that there are many other errors, so I'm removing it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.4.243.218 (talk) 22:06, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]