This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sheet metal article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
2 of the 4 external links are broken Tweet7 (talk) 22:54, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
The way this is written, it implies sheet metal has only been around since 1500 AD... pretty sure that's not true... Yeah I'm pretty sure the Japanese had that covered since day one.
Fair point, but what metals were used, were any of them alloys and what was the standard thickness(es) - or just an example of that available in an influential province; or a locality with, say, a concentration of master craftsmen - in the West, ‘blacksmiths’ I guess. On Day OneTweet7 (talk) 23:06, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
The gauge section didn't explain 'gauge' entirely.
Seconded - having read this : . . .
"The weight of steel per square foot per inch of thickness is 41.82 lb (18.96 kg), this is known as the Manufacturers' Standard Gage for Sheet Steel"
I still have no idea what Gauge actually means. How could I use that to work out what thickness 18 gauge is. I find it hard to believe that an engineering unit is both arbitrary and non-linear - is it a left-over from an earlier age ?
I answer my own question. Yes, gauge is both non-linear and arbitrary. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_wire_gauge. I'll edit the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fentlehan (talk • contribs) 14:57, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
--69.151.57.205 (talk) 09:07, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
It is interesting to note that the table headings no longer identify Manufacturer's Standard Gauge, despite the fact that the section opens with an explicit statement about MSG. The third column of the Table, simply identifies "Steel", which may or may not be the MSG thicknesses.Extraordinary Spaces (talk) 04:36, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
As you noted, Gauge is archaic. See comments below on Sheet Thicknesses for some more info. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.156.60.130 (talk) 20:32, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
>Use of gauge numbers to designate sheet metal thickness is discouraged by numerous international standards organizations. Sort of like how the eu discourages its member states from leaving the eu? lmao, wikipedia is so valuable to humanity! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1011:B055:1832:5C54:6965:8BFC:DC89 (talk) 09:47, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
the following link, while still somewhat unhelpful has some things to add to this conversation. http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/gauge.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.200.61.2 (talk) 16:42, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
> The gauge is not arbitrary. There is a regular pattern for the steel and iron column. I added a column showing the values in 1/64ths of an inch and the regularity is apparent there. The only arbitrary part is when the thickness increment (delta between gauges) steps down. This means a single formula for gauge-to-thickness is not possible, but piece-wise formulae can be stated. NOTE: the values shown in the steel and iron column (column 2) have been rounded up from the source [14]. I used the original numbers from the source to calculate the values in the new column. Using the values shown in column 2 will not give the results with showing the regular progression. I did not analyze any other columns. Dunzo Clunes (talk) 19:33, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
They pre date 1500. If you consider things like breastplates and helmets it is more like thousands of years before 1500AD.
can any body tell that how on sheet metal , geometry and numbers of embossments and beads are determined59.160.18.209 (talk) 05:56, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
for example on the car platform ,how are no. and geometry of embossments are decided? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.160.18.209 (talk) 10:33, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
The article sheet metal forming is just a partial list of processes, just like the one here. However, the list in sheet metal at least has an introduction for each. I don't see any reason why there needs to be a separate article to list the same things. Wizard191 (talk) 00:32, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
I see no reason why the gauge needs to be listed in another article. I thought that it was missing, but then found that one obscure link led to the page. Wizard191 (talk) 23:34, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
agreed, one stop reading is always best 17:07, 19 September 2008 (UTC)B3tech —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.61.198.62 (talk)
There's an abreviation CRS which is linked to article "Steel". That article does not explain the term CRS. 82.103.194.225 (talk) 19:26, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Cold Rolled Steel —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.70.244.178 (talk) 22:27, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Can anybody tell me up to what thickness the piece is called sheet metal after that up to what it is called plate and above what thickness it is called a metal block? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiran engr (talk • contribs) 06:06, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
gauges are not used with a decimal i.e 16.5 they most commonly in incraments of "2" like 18ga. 20ga. 22ga. ect. they also usually start calling it plate at 1/4 " or .250. the term crs is an acronym of "cold rolled steel" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.196.64.56 (talk) 20:42, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Is there a more definitive source for the tolerances (e.g. max and min thickness) for sheet steel than a reference to a commercial supplier's information? The sheet steel thicknesses look a lot like the Manufacturer's Standard Gauge (I didn't check explicitly) but to the best of my knowledge, that "standard" did not include tolerances. So what is the source and is there a unique reference or is this something that was "created" by one supplier and then quoted and requoted to become defacto. Extraordinary Spaces (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:22, 28 October 2010 (UTC).
Thickness table--Zinc seems to be reversed. 99.236.162.167 (talk) 02:21, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
I've done a bunch of research on this topic for my companies' design guide. We do a lot of sheet metal manufacturing. First, suppliers are only moderately accurate. A few things they generally avoid telling you, they almost always supply on the minimal side of thickness. This should be expected because they charge you per sheet, but it is per mass that they buy the raw material. Thinner sheet, more sheets per lump they buy. Second, if you don't specify a standard to which to buy from, they can't really be blamed if they wiggle on what thickness they provide you if you specify a gauge. Sure, their website says 14 gauge is .078", but your inspection guys tell you what they got is .0747". Probably not what you expected, but for uncoated cold rolled steel sheet that's pretty standard. Now how about when you purchase Electro-Galvanized or Galvannealed steel sheet? Enough on that. Engineering best practice is to specify what standard you are using. Currently the most widely accepted of these (and generally what you are going to get anyway) are ASTM (A480, A568) and ISO for steel sheet. Aluminum is typically ANSI (H35) or ISO. The ASTM specs generally state a minimal thickness (i.e. + something, - nothing) but also make it clear that the purchase order should specify nominal or minimum thickness. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.156.60.130 (talk) 20:29, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
There are a couple CNC videos that may be beneficial for this article. Here is a video of a CNC Punch / Laser press cutting sheet metal:
http://www.crosstownmetal.com/plant-capacity/cnc-laser-video/
Here is a video of CNC press brake bending sheet metal:
http://www.crosstownmetal.com/plant-capacity/cnc-brake-video/
Bc_flyfisher June 23, 2009
The main article could be improved if there were a paragraph or two on "sheet metal working for beginners" - since I have never worked with sheet metal, and am anticipating the construction of a metal roof on a small tool shed in my backyard. I already have access to a fair amount of sheet metal. I need to worry about the load of the wind on the shed, but I don't have to worry about vertical load because nothing will be resting on top of it. (Or should I start worrying about that?) I need somewhere to put my lawnmowers and power tools. That's why I need to build a little shed.
I need to know if cutting a big piece of sheet metal into long vertical strips is going to be a whole lot easier (or less expensive) using a pneumatic grinder + air compressor, or an electric circular saw + grinding wheel. I'm anticipating marking the sheet metal with a permanent marker before cutting. Some helpful advice right now will help out a lot before I start on the wrong path of construction/destruction. Yes, I will buy some visors. Are certain kinds of gloves better than others? 216.99.219.95 (talk) 20:45, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Can anybody please define details of hardness checking methods of sheet metals. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.124.137.2 (talk) 02:20, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Could the info under brake press forming not be added to the brake press page, which could then be linked to from this page as per the other methods? The cutting section is also quite poor. Laser cutting seams very hurriedly thrust in there. What about water jet cutting? Plasma? Te list goes on. dhutch (talk) 21:03, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Mention of "most common" types of materials seems to be slanted to particular vendor sources. It certainly doesn't match my own experience, per se. For example, I would question which conditions or tempers are actually more common for aluminum. In that, I actually question the necessarity for that heading. I would like to see non-vendor based sourcing for the information, if possible. If not possible, I would like to see a rewrite/removal of the section because notiability comes into question. — fcsuper (How's That?, That's How!) (Exclusionistic Immediatist ) — 18:36, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
It seems like an encyclopedia article on sheet metal should include at least some reference as to how it is manufactured. So much of the article is devoted on how to form it, but how does it come to be in the first place? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.0.202.234 (talk) 01:47, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
"Usage of steel as a building material is popular as a cost effective, quality material as compared to the alternatives.[2] The three most common stainless steel grades available in sheet metal are 304, 316, and 410.[3]
Grade 304 is the most common of the three grades. It offers good corrosion resistance while maintaining formability and weldability. Available finishes are #2B, #3, and #4. Grade 303 is not available in sheet form.[3]"
Is "303" a typo for "304"?
can a metal piece of thickness 0.6 mm could be called as metal sheet — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.227.199.65 (talk) 13:33, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
There are several errors in the thickness and tolerance charts. e.g. the nominal thickness for stainless steel 16ga sheet should be .0625". The thickness ranges is the tolerance chart do not line up properly with the gauge column and the values are not in agreement with the thickness chart. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.24.147.249 (talk) 12:38, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
I believe your table is backwards....smaller the gauge.... the thickness should increase not decrease. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.10.100.85 (talk) 16:53, 26 July 2016 (UTC)