Oppose. This would amount to redirecting "small penis" to "penis" which is not helpful and would, I suspect, not survive RfD. Either leave it alone, or delete. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:41, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Shhhnotsoloud, How do you figure it would "amount to redirecting 'small penis' to 'penis'" Penis (disambiguation) is the proposed merger target; thus, small penis would be redirected there. Human and other mammal males both have penises of varying sizes and neither is primary topic. Doug MehusT·C 16:44, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Shhhnotsoloud, I'm not opposed to leaving it alone, but what I am opposed to is to converting small penis into a redirect to human penis size, as proposed by only one editor, because human males aren't the only male mammals with penises regardless of size. If there is support for a merger of the disambiguation pages, great. If not, I am fine with that, too, but in my opinion, the penis size-related redirects should point to either of, in preference, (1) small penis; (2) penis (disambiguation); (3) a split article of penis on the sizing of penises of all mammals; or (4) (somewhat weakly, perhaps) to penis. It should not point (no pun intended; this is a pun minefield!) human penis size. Your thoughts? Doug MehusT·C 15:41, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, I've realised this is not the merger discussion. I've now commented at the right place. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:00, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]