The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to penis size; the arguments for disambiguation are correct, that the navigation needs to be served, but this can be done with or without a primary topic. Per Spicy's argument, the nav function being argued for can also be handled with a primary topic; will expand the hatnote there as well. -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:45, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Small penis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see how this disambiguation page serves any navigational purpose. The entries on the page, excluding "see alsos", are "A relatively small penis in any animal that has one, including humans"; Human penis size; and Micropenis. The first entry is not an actual article topic and cannot plausibly be one since non-human animals do not have the capacity to be concerned about their penis sizes in the way that humans are. It is also so obvious that it is hardly worth stating. The latter two entries do not need to be disambiguated, because micropenis is a subgroup of small human penises, not a distinct topic, and it is already linked in the lead of Human penis size. Spicy (talk) 00:06, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Spicy (talk) 00:06, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Spicy (talk) 00:06, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 19:17, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Levivich[dubiousdiscuss] 06:36, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that small penis shouldn't redirect to micropenis. But what you are describing could be accomplished by redirecting it to human penis size, which links to micropenis in the lead. A hatnote could be added for extra clarity. Spicy (talk) 08:11, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Small penis and the male sexual role
  2. Structured management and counseling for patients with a complaint of a small penis
  3. Management of men complaining of a small penis despite an actually normal size
  4. Systematic review of surgical and nonsurgical interventions in normal men complaining of small penis size
  5. In an imperfect world, men with small penises are unforgiven
  6. Treatment of men complaining of short penis
  7. Efficacy of the daily penis-stretching technique to elongate the 'small penis'
  8. Consultation for Small-Sized Penis in the Egyptian Males
  9. Penile size and the 'small penis syndrome'
  10. Normative diagnosis and treatment of small penis
Andrew🐉(talk) 10:30, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.