This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
When Jack was going through the pictures of himself, there was one of his wedding day. Was that Estelle, or was it Gwyneth, or was it somebody else altogether? My eyes sort of couldn't tell.~ZytheTalk to me!22:53, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image: The image is being considered for deletion, sort this out; might I suggest adding a better rationale than just "To illustrate a key element of the plot."
It was fine when I nominated the article. I've tried to flesh out the rationale as much as possible and have emphasised comments in the reception section which discuss this as a plot development.
Lede: Link 'second series'
Linked.
Plot: I feel that 'synopsis' under plot is kind of redundant, since there isn't another section
Removed subheading.
Plot: "half-eaten corpse" Who's corpse is this?
Clarified.
References: I believe you should always have a reference tag after a direct quote. For instance, after "…commonly seen on soaps"; "…good performances from the team"; "cheesy soap opera moments"; etc.
WP:CITEFOOT just states "it is usually sufficient to add the citation to the end of the sentence or paragraph, so long as it's clear which source supports which part of the text". I think it's clear that in the case of the reviews that the direct quotes are attributed the review cited. I feel that having the same reference used successively looks a bit untidy, but I'm happy to change it if necessary.
References: Ref 10 I would just cite as "Andy et al, p. 82"
Done.
References: Ref 14 seems to have broken link to Digital Spy
I have just modified 2 external links on Something Borrowed (Torchwood). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.