I tagged this as the article is in effect a mini essay by Bjoe using his own material. Its probably a candidate for deletion There is already an article on this subject which includes Boje's work (or did last time I looked in it. Given the odd personal attack from this editor I am not nominating it for deletion, but just bringing this to other editors attention. --Snowded ^TALK 18:52, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To: Dave Snowden

From: David Boje

Please cease and desist in your campaign to purge my pages from Wikipedia

The theory of 'storytelling organization' has a long an extensive published history.

I consider this to be personal harassment by you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dboje (talk • contribs) 19:15, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is no campaign, please do make unsupported accusations its a failure to follow AGF. I am bringing the attention of other editors to the fact that you have created an article based on your own theory. Other than doing that I'm leaving it to the community. As I am involved I am not nominating it for deletion, if I was a neutral editor I would. Now leave it for other editors to comment, they may agree with you in which case the tag can be removed. You should read WP:INDENT by the way, I edited it for you above --Snowded ^TALK 19:22, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This section as edited was clear OR, the whole article has a single author theory to it, but it was especially strong in that section. If inserted again it needs to be agreed here first and based on third party sources. --Snowded ^TALK 22:23, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. In particular, because the Antenarrative article was deleted following a consensus discussion, attempts to recreate the material as a subsection of other articles really need to overcome the rationale expressed in that deletion discussion - namely that the text as given did not establish that this concept is discussed independently of David Boje. — Gavia immer (talk) 22:37, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could someone who understands the subject(s?) slightly better than me clarify if this article is redundant to Organizational storytelling? O Fenian (talk) 17:49, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See my opening comments, I can't see any justification for another article that simply reverses the order of words. Any valid material here could easily go into the wider one, --Snowded ^TALK 19:45, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have boldly redirected this article, and will take for wider discussion if it is restored. The other articles has problems of its own though, I have just tagged the majority of it as copyright violations from two sources. O Fenian (talk) 20:39, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]