This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Automobiles Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Brands Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Slovakia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovakia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Slovakia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SlovakiaWikipedia:WikiProject SlovakiaTemplate:WikiProject SlovakiaSlovakia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please note that this page in its current form was written by a Sygic employee, Martin Kalis (user, LinkedIn). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kimsey0 (talk • contribs) 22:14, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I take issue with the tone of the Overview section. A lot of it sounds like an advertisement for Sygic's navigation systems. It cites primary (biased) sources and engages in bashing of its competitors. List of phrases and sentences I find most problematic:

• "well-oriented travel"
• "all-round full featured application that focuses on its wide usability"
• The entire third paragraph for Google-bashing, which is unacceptable for an encyclopaedia.
• "using the minimal amount of memory on their devices" (based on bad source)

--78.34.219.8 (talk) 21:44, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]