GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: DannyMusicEditor (talk · contribs) 18:35, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


I'll review this one for my buddy Yeepsi here. Although I was never a fan of this album, I did end up liking TBS later on and I know they're an emo/pop punk icon. I have made one edit to the article about two months ago if I remember correctly, but nothing major enough to get in the way of the GA review rules. Coming soon. dannymusiceditor Speak up! 18:35, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking this! Yeepsi (talk) 18:39, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Yeepsi: If I stop and don't do anything with this review for more than five days, please ping me. dannymusiceditor Speak up! 22:12, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Initial checklist

[edit]

At the beginning of the review, this is how it stood.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Specifically word choice.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Not really any images you can use for albums, and the image that is used has rationale for fair use.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

However, these all were resolved.

Lead

[edit]

 Done all above. Yeepsi (talk) 23:17, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Background

[edit]
I found this from OC Weekly: ""I think Jesse Lacey is just a dick," he says. "He just sucks. He's not a good person."" Apart from that I couldn't turn up anything else. Yeepsi (talk) 23:33, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Good enough for me. Write something about how Jesse also had a problem with Adam and it inspired a rivalry between the bands. dannymusiceditor Speak up! 16:00, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have a source of DeJoseph leaving (or when he left, for that matter), unfortunately. Should I remove the sentence? Yeepsi (talk) 21:31, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Whatever, I guess I can live with it. dannymusiceditor Speak up! 18:32, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Done all above apart from the DeJoseph part. Yeepsi (talk) 21:31, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Composition

[edit]

Ugh. Did the copyeditor write all this? I have a problem with almost every sentence.

 Done all above. Yeepsi (talk) 22:05, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Production

[edit]

 Done all above. Yeepsi (talk) 22:09, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Release

[edit]
It's the Country of release / Record label / Catalogue number. I've seen it done for The Division Bell (GA) and The Dark Side of the Moon (FA). I'll ditch it if you insist. Yeepsi (talk) 22:27, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If the FA has it, then I guess I'll roll with it (though it's not in my idea of one). dannymusiceditor Speak up! 01:30, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
How does this sound: "To promote the album, Victory founder Tony Brummel targeted people who were familiar with the label and also fans of emo."? Yeepsi (talk) 22:27, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Good enough for me! dannymusiceditor Speak up! 01:26, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Done all apart from two. Yeepsi (talk) 22:27, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kudos to you for fixing that other stuff I didn't notice! I was sure those didn't have pages, guess I should be more careful. dannymusiceditor Speak up! 02:16, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reception and legacy

[edit]
I've heard the singles from it, but not got round to hearing the whole album yet. Yeepsi (talk) 11:56, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Done all above. Yeepsi (talk) 11:56, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Review completed! Everything else looks great! dannymusiceditor Speak up! 02:16, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

With that, I'll Pass! Congratulations! dannymusiceditor Speak up! 13:45, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]