This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Butterfly Effect article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2 |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"The final alternate ending is again similar to the previous one, Evan and Kayleigh hesitantly stop on the street when they cross each other but do not meet each others gaze and continue on their original path." - is this not the actual (non-alternate) ending? Should be removed, right? –anemoneprojectors– 22:53, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
im pretty sure he called it an alternate ending too because all of the outcomes are alternate realities — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.124.128.27 (talk) 02:32, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Do you know where i can see this version? The one i have watched has him going back to being a baby and starting over again, with him and Kayleigh together Scampi69 (talk) 20:30, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Is the ending described in the article correct? Coz I saw the movie and found the ending to be different. He tries to die in his mother's womb and then some scenes of a new life pass by and then Keyleigh gets married. Isn't this the correct ending?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielsundersingh (talk • contribs) 07:37, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Director's cut was the one shown in Denmark (DR2 20:00-21:55 2012-05-30) The different endings show how the story is constructed. The real scoop would be to find why the director prefers this ending. Director's cut corresponds to the current articles next-to-last part of the plot: //quote//Evan realizes that the main cause of everyone's suffering in all the different timelines is himself.//end-quote// The Theatrical ending seems more mature to me: The time dimension has given the protagonist more insight and he accepts other people's happiness, not as a ghost, but as a living person; therefore I wonder why the director prefers the other ending. --d-axel (talk) 20:14, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
The article has a category "Films about mathematics". Can someone clarify this? I saw the movie years ago, but don't remember it having anything to do with mathematics. —Ynhockey (Talk) 21:28, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
What do ghosts have to do with this movie? Is it something from one of the sequels? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.92.153.146 (talk) 18:09, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Is the ending described in the article correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielsundersingh (talk • contribs) 07:34, 29 March 2012 (UTC)