This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 January 2021 and 30 April 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Imartins34, Jaimeneto17. Peer reviewers: Bluewildflowers, Ian F Whitman, LorraineRodz, Anniep256.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:12, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
It would be good if the article introduction acknowledged the original 1972 film adaption, albeit a short film, by director Hawley Pratt for CBS (see The Lorax at IMDb).
I'd suggest at least an additional paragraph following the 2nd of the two existing paragraphs, and perhaps also an opening note that indicates the book has been adapted to film twice. Suitable relevant notes in the subsequent sections would be nice for completeness, but not essential. Paulszym (talk) 13:51, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
A Teaser Trailer of this film was attached with Puss in Boots on November 4, 2011. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.144.243 (talk) 11:58, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
In the Logo of Illumination Entertainment, One Eyed Minion dressed as a Tree was chased around the logo by Two Eyed Minion dressed as a Lumberjack. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.224.45 (talk) 06:12, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
It can't possibly be a coincidence that Ted and Audrey share the names of Dr. Seuss (real name Theodor Seuss Geisel) and his widow Audrey Geisel! It just can't be! - Jasonbres (talk) 21:08, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
Ed Helms as The Once-ler-The tritagonist. He is a tall woodsman that cutted down... Who added this? This is an encyclopedia, and the grammar in it needs to have a gooder standard, I mean a better standard. Someone please edit this. Rsercher (talk) 00:15, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
"The film received mixed reviews from critics" is correct, and expanding on that fact by listing every beat down from every angle on the movie and nothing else is a skewed summary. This needs to be evened out.71.162.2.215 (talk) 01:47, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Someone, over the past days, tried to insert this cast, Fletcher Sheridan, as the singing voice of Cy The O'Hare Delivery Guy. It has been reverted probably due to the fact he wasn't even credited in the film (according to IMDb), not to mention that he's only the singing voice. Generally I think the cast should consist of the main and the involved characters only, and leave out the rest. If this keeps happening, I'm afraid I (or someone) will request semi-protection of this article (prevents editing by IPs and new accounts). theinstantmatrix (talk) 21:51, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: no apparent consensus favoring this move; for the time being, the 1972 TV special has been moved back to The Lorax (TV special), so this can wait until any other change makes the proposed move here advisable. Dekimasuよ! 01:22, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
The Lorax (film) → The Lorax (2012 film) – To differentiate from the 1972 film. None of the films are the primary topic, only the source novel is. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:34, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
The Lorax (1972 film)
to move it back to The Lorax (TV special)
, but most users have voted against that decision, with justifiable reasons. Hence, this page must be moved to avoid confusion. --Kailash29792 (talk) 07:17, 24 April 2018 (UTC)I had read a long time ago about there being a sequel in the early 2010's but it has never happened and it is now 2020. — Arhpuppylove (talk) 01:32, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
@50.100.168.93:, @Gouleg: Please stop reverting each other's edits repeatedly, you both have already broken the 3RR. This has clearly evolved into an edit war. 50.100.169.93, you either need to add a source, or please stop adding questionable information repeatedly. Gummycow moomilk 20:10, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please make Thneedville a redirect to this page. 90.255.6.219 (talk) 10:48, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
The first paragraph states that 'The Lorax' is a 'musical comedy film' ... Citation needed for the comedy claim? To be clear, I did find it unfunny, but aside from subjective opinions, there were very few lines that seemed like they were *intended* as jokes. Given that it's based on a children's story doesn't seem sufficient for concluding that it's a comedy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8800:72B4:3A00:D878:C722:C3DE:66FD (talk) 20:08, 30 July 2023 (UTC)