This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Which events are considered notable enough to be included here? Should minor events be moved to decades or years? The fact that all editions the Olympics were removed raises this question. - Munmula (talk), second account of Alumnum 15:34, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not all of them. I kept the first ones. Regular, cyclical events, like sporting events, aren't really relevant as they are predicted to happen, like days or months of the year. It had nothing to do with whether they were a "major" or a "minor" event. To be honest I'm not sure how you'd quantify that. Serendipodous 17:26, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There isn't any reason to include links to the articles on various days of the year. Please give reasons based on Wikipedia policies before making reverts, especially such anonymous reverts. tahcchat 04:33, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Are we using preterite present or past tense?[edit]
We need to establish a standard, and then write it in the editing box. Serendipodous 12:14, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]