This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
I am leaving comments on how to further improve the article here per a request on my talk page.
I have two different comments about this sentence: In contrast to her previous work, A Silent Voice, To Your Eternity is set focus on the cast's futures rather than past. The set focus part does not make sense and would need to be revised. I have never read either of these two manga, but I am curious on how a story can completely focus on its characters' past without anything on their future?
The transitions in this sentence, Nevertheless, Fushi's continuous character arc was praised while Ōima's artwork received positive feedback based on its detailed facial expressions and environments., do not make sense. Nevertheless does not work in this context as the previous sentence was about the premiere getting positive reviews and this sentence is about the series continuing to get positive reviews. While does not work in this context either as it is used to indicate a contrast and both the character arc and artwork received praise.
It happens. It is good that you added transition words like that, but it is important to remember the context of everything too. Aoba47 (talk) 19:58, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The "Plot" section reads more like an introduction to the plot instead of a summary. It leaves out details that are only revealed later in the article. Instances of this include the arctic setting and March's death. Articles like Naruto and The Heart of Thomas go into more detail with their summaries so I was curious on why the same is not done here? Is this "Plot" section structured like this because it is still an-ongoing series?
→ Whatever the case, at this moment, I would not add to the plot, given the distance between the manga and anime (which is indeed ongoing). Horsesizedduck (talk) 17:49, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Could you clarify what you mean by "the distance between the manga and anime"? I am reading it as the manga and anime being very different in terms of story, but I want to make sure that I am correct in that interpretation. Aoba47 (talk) 19:58, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
→ The anime is an adaptation of the manga, which is quite further ahead in the story from where the anime is right now. I'm concerned for the possibility that, should the plot synopsis be expanded with all the content of the manga, a newcomer to the story might get massively spoiled. However, I'm unfamiliar with Wikipedia's general guidelines regarding these situations, so I tend to err on the side of caution. Horsesizedduck (talk) 21:39, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia includes spoiler in the plot summary. To be perfectly honest, if a newcomer looks this up and chooses to read the plot summary, they cannot get mad if they are spoiled since they are going out of their way to read the plot in the first place. Aoba47 (talk) 21:56, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
For this part, he takes the form of a rock, then a dying wolf, say arctic wolf in full as just saying wolf is unnecessarily misleading and somewhat of an Easter egg.
For this part, An exiled villager friend/older sister figure, I would avoid using the backslash in the prose in such a way. I would instead just say An exiled villager friend and older sister figure.
For these two parts, Manga artistYoshitoki Ōima conceived the title "To Your Eternity" and She chose "To Your Eternity", why is the title put in quotation marks and not in italics?
I would link primary school in this part, originated from Ōima's work in primary school, as it may be helpful for some readers.
In this part, Ōima wanted to make the protagonist neutral, and said she prefers neutral female characters., what is meant by neutral?
→ The reference presumably containing those words is in Japanese, so I can't really elaborate on that. I would prefer to delete it, and re-add later if necessary. Horsesizedduck (talk) 17:17, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It may be helpful to do more search on what the Japanese words are referencing instead. While machine translations like Google Translate are very helpful, instances like this one show that it is important to do some research into the language so you get the right meanings. Aoba47 (talk) 19:56, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
In this part, and the bear as obstacles of the human will., say polar bear in full as just saying bear is unnecessarily misleading and somewhat of an Easter egg.
Nice work. Already archived all references and expanded the main plot a bit. There is a main arc but it is developed through several story arcs that might across as either a premise or a incomplete plot.Tintor2 (talk) 19:51, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have already put a comment about this above, but I just wanted to say this is correct. If a newcomer really wants to avoid spoilers, they can still read the lead, which should be an overview of the anime as a whole. That being said, if someone wanted to read or watch something completely spoiler-free, I am not entirely sure why they would read the Wikipedia article first. Aoba47 (talk) 21:57, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your patience and taking the time to do this. The plot summary already looks a lot better to me in that it gives me a better understanding of the plot. Aoba47 (talk) 22:31, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I added an alternative summary in a comment, covering all 15.5 volumes in ~1000 words. I tried to cover only the most important events and mention only the most important characters, and avoid character description as there is a separate section for that. The later events are slightly more detailed, as they are more complicated than the early ones. 204.112.199.2 (talk) 00:06, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The English voice actors for child Gugu and Rean need a source.
Removed. Not even Behind the Voice Actors confirm it. Neither the actors' twitter accounts.
The character descriptions for Mia, Oopa, Sandel, and Uroy are all just the same one line. If that same line is all that can be said about them, are they worth mentioning at all?
It is entirely possible that this is due to machine translation issues, but I can't find the statement "Each volume cover represents a character's dream such as the first one, which depicts the unnamed youth finding freedom. Volume three depicts Fushi's dream, which is to live happily and peacefully with everyone" in the Kono Manga interview.
This isn't a critique, but a question. Do you have a reason to consider Manga Mexico and Fantasy Mundo as reliable sources?
Both sites cite the original publisher for their region's release and are linked with sites that sell the volumes among other type of merchandising. Hope this helps.