This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
I don't think that it's revelant for this article to include a bulleted list containing the full five Atkinson principles. I think that mentioning their existance (such as in the sentance currently before the bulleted list) would be sufficent. Would anyone disagree with the removal of the list? If so, can we discuss why? Clovermoss (talk) 12:07, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Reading over that section initially I agreed with you, but now I think it is relevant for them to be here since the paper was guided by those principles. Canterbury Tailtalk 12:14, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I definitely think we should keep them. They seem pretty fundamental to how the paper operates and they are sourced. —Joeyconnick (talk) 18:55, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That's POV-pushing. That text is a quotation to catch someone's interest (which it surely did). Unfortunately, all newspapers seem to engage in this practce these days. Moreover, the image is low quality, with terrible cropping or framing. Mindmatrix 18:48, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]