This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romance, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional romance in literature and romantic fiction writers. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.RomanceWikipedia:WikiProject RomanceTemplate:WikiProject Romanceromance articles
- I changed 'crushed on' to 'was infatuated with' in one of the first paragraphs. I tried to find out definitively if 'crushed on' was slang or not, but could not. If someone more experienced with the english language finds out otherwise please feel free to edit it. Eelozano 03:38, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Removed it again. Its having the actors is not a valid reason to remove a pointless bit of fluff. Major characters can be listed in the drama section but they are otherwise very minor. -- AnmaFinotera (talk·contribs) 01:40, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The drama is an unnotable adaptation with barely any reliable sources at all. Almost all anime series articles that cover television dramas do not include those actors in the character list. At best, the main role actors are noted in the section noting the series was adapted (nor do most include the episode lists). -- AnmaFinotera (talk·contribs) 01:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I thought you might be referring to 'who bothers about drama actors when there are anime actors'. Can you please show me an exemplar article with the correct character format? --Malkinann (talk) 02:02, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The only page numbers that come with the English releases are those for the beginning of chapters - the section I'm using is at the back of the book. --Malkinann (talk) 02:13, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
All of the pages are numbered. Count if needed...but need to list page number and, preferably, include the section name. Otherwise it appears the whole volume is the reference when it is not. -- AnmaFinotera (talk·contribs) 02:15, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Which would be... the start of the last chapter. ^^* They seem to be about the same, 175 from the first method and 176 from the second method. --Malkinann (talk) 02:39, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified 8 external links on Tramps Like Us. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.