USS Sitkoh Bay has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: December 4, 2020. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles Military history: Aviation / Maritime / North America / United States / World War II This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force Maritime warfare task force North American military history task force United States military history task force World War II task force

This review is transcluded from Talk:USS Sitkoh Bay/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 17:03, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• "She therefore received the classification symbol CVE-86, indicating that she was the eighty-second escort carrier" - I'm a little confused. The numeral 86 meant that she was the 82nd carrier? Unless eighty-second is an error for eighty-sixth, this should probably be explained in a footnote.
• Formatting's a little off. From what I've seen, it's generally not liked to have images stretching below the references, so can the images get moved around/reduced in number so that they aren't stretching out below everything else?
• I've made a minor spelling correction

From my readthrough, this seems really close to meeting the GA criteria. I'll be placing this one on hold. Hog Farm _Bacon 03:36, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• @Hog Farm: I've addressed your points. Stikkyy t/c 05:15, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]