USS Thetis Bay has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 6, 2021. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles Military history: Aviation / Maritime / North America / United States / World War II This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force Maritime warfare task force North American military history task force United States military history task force World War II task force

This review is transcluded from Talk:USS Thetis Bay/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 12:55, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• "painted in Measure 33, Design 10A camouflage" isn't mentioned in the article or referenced here.

• Changes in camouflage aren't usually recorded, and I think that it provides some useful context when viewing the image.

• I just wanted to see it referenced. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 07:01, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• "mythology.[3] The" always seems odd to cite just one fact in a lead. This should be mentioned in the main body so just reference it there.
• "the Nereid Thetis" mildly troubling sea of blue issue here, especially if you don't (and many won't) know what Nereid means.
• "The bay is .." we've somewhat lost this in the previous lengthy sentence.
• "The ship was launched in March..." similar, perhaps we can say "Thetis Bay was launched..."

• Both addressed by moving the naming part down.

• "in Operation Magic Carpet" no need for a pipelink.
• "early war losses" would that be "early-war losses"?
• "1 Battle star" -> "1 battle star".
• "Washington under" comma after Washington.
• Yeah, the naming details belong here, not in the lead. Or at least in both place, not exclusively the lead.
• Year ranges in service record in infobox should use en-dash not hyphen to separate.
• Some text sandwiching going on where you have images both left and right of text.
• "Luzon, the Philippines throughout" comma after Philippines.
• " a Landing Platform Helicopter" why is that capitalised?
• "In August 1959, Thetis Bay" too many run-ons and I'm not sure the grammar works at the end...
• "anchored off of" no need for of.
• "from the Navy list on" any reason we can't give it the full official name?
• Ref 10, I have to subscribe to see this.
• Fix text size of External links et seq.

That's all I have for now. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 19:41, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @The Rambling Man: I've addressed your points. Stikkyy t/c 20:55, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]