GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: HueSatLum (talk · contribs) 19:46, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As thanks for reviewing my article, I will take this review. I will post anything I see here in the coming days. ~HueSatLum 19:46, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Yes, this was one of my earlier image uploads from when I didn't quite understand the copyright issues. Furthermore, as you probably realised the source website statement regarding use of the image is not accurate. I have updated the image tag. Zawed (talk) 09:42, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks for taking the time to review this one, it is greatly appreciated. And thanks for catching the age at DoD in the lead. That was a howler on my part! Cheers. Zawed (talk) 09:42, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sorted, also removed link on England
Added a wikilink
No, the VF of the article is the precursor to the NZ Territorial Force.
Done. Zawed (talk) 06:05, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. Thanks for the feedback. Zawed (talk) 06:05, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it is common, and not just in the NZEF. In wartime conditions, when a country's military has expanded rapidly (as was the case in the NZ Military Forces which before the war relatively few personnel as opposed to the tens of thousands of soldiers during WWI) this can lead to a shortage of officers, particularly at senior rank. The structure of the military is such that units of certain formations/sizes are commanded by officers of specific ranks. For example, a battalion would be commanded by a lieutenant colonel (or colonel), a brigade by a brigadier - this rank didn't exist in the NZEF in WWI hence brigadier general). Braithewaite had a substantive rank of major but if placed in command of a brigade in this rank, he would be subservient to his fellow brigade commanders who would outrank him. This could be problematic if one of them ordered him to undertake actions which would jeopardise his brigade - hence the temporary promotion to ensure he has appropriate authority to exercise his command (but he would have been paid at his substantive or permanent rank). Your query made me review the article again and I have added a bit about his lieutenant colonel rank being made substantive).
I had accidentally filled in the supplement field of the London Gazette template. The link works now.
The article pretty much has everything pertaining to both his early and late life.
Responded to your queries as above. Thanks. Zawed (talk) 06:52, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]