Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Harry Fulton you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jim Sweeney -- Jim Sweeney (talk) 19:51, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Awarded to Zawed, as part of AustralianRupert's 2014 New Year Honours List, in recognition of his work as an article writer working on New Zealand-related articles throughout 2013. Thank you and keep up the good work! AustralianRupert (talk) 21:26, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks AR! Although it is not the reason why I edit here, it is nice to be recognised for one's work. Zawed (talk) 23:31, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Harry Fulton you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Harry Fulton for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jim Sweeney -- Jim Sweeney (talk) 10:11, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Harry Fulton you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Harry Fulton for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jim Sweeney -- Jim Sweeney (talk) 08:22, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Fulton has been assessed as a Good Article. Well done Cheers! Jim Sweeney (talk) 08:26, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jim! Cheers! Zawed (talk) 11:06, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

		The WikiProject Barnstar
		I am delighted to present you with this WikiProject Barnstar in recognition of your extensive contributions to the Military history WikiProject, as evidenced by your being nominated for the 2013 "Military historian of the Year" award. We're grateful for your help and look forward to seeing more of your excellent work in the coming year. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:13, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Zawed (talk) 10:19, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D, Zawed and Hawkeye7 look at recent releases

Greetings Zawed, it was nice to see that 3rd Ypres has a new book. Did MacDonald put all the blame on Godley or put his failings into a context of the British machine beginning to break down in other respects too? RegardsKeith-264 (talk) 15:06, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gidday Keith-264, I hope you found the review interesting. Sorry for delay in getting back to you, I have just moved house (downsized actually, to an apartment). Godley cops the lion's share of blame; fundamentally, MacDonald is critical of Godley's leadership style, his focus on his career, the way in which he ran his headquarters and his blind adherence to a timetable regardless of deteriorating conditions. His analysis is more directed at the tactical level (corps/divisional arrangements) rather than at a strategic (army) level. Does that answer your question? Zawed (talk) 08:07, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It does thanks. I was most influenced when writing on the page by stories like the air reconnaissance report which erroneously put the front line after Poelcapelle where it was supposed to be, rather than 500 yards west - the sort of practical detail that general remarks about the collapse of links with the rear amount to. It seemed to me that the return of the rains made the successes of 20, 26 Sep and 4 Oct backfire, similar to the dilemmas that the Germans encountered at Verdun the year before - go on or go back, exploit the effect of 4 Oct/9 Oct by having another go quickly. I'll have a go at an inter-library loan considering the price. You might be interested in Krause Early Trench Tactics in the French Army 2013 which makes a good case for the failings of the French and British in 1915 being implementation rather than ignorance of what worked. Hope you're settling in. RegardsKeith-264 (talk) 08:29, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article William Garnett Braithwaite you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HueSatLum -- HueSatLum (talk) 19:51, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zawed. You have new messages at Jim Sweeney's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

The article William Garnett Braithwaite you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:William Garnett Braithwaite for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HueSatLum -- HueSatLum (talk) 22:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article William Edward Sanders you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 10:10, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article William Edward Sanders you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:William Edward Sanders for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 15:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Rabaul in World War II and Australia in World War I

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Thomas Brunner may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• born April 1821, in [[Oxford]], [[England]]; died 22 April 1874 in [[Nelson, New Zealand]]) was an [English-born [[Surveying|surveyor]] and [[explorer]] remembered for his exploration of the [[West

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:38, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 on military command and Nick-D on F-111s in combat

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at Britain's War Machine Interview: Article writers discuss German military history

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

BRM P126 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pedro Rodriguez

BRM P133 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pedro Rodriguez

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Thomas Brunner you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rosiestep -- Rosiestep (talk) 20:52, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Thomas Brunner you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Thomas Brunner for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rosiestep -- Rosiestep (talk) 13:21, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

		The Content Review Medal of Merit
		By order of the Military history WikiProject coordinators, for your devoted contributions to the WikiProject's Peer, Good Article, A-Class and Featured Article reviews for the period January–March 2014, I am delighted to award you the Content Review Medal of Merit. During this period you undertook 8 reviews. Without reviewers it would be very difficult for our writers to achieve their goals of creating high quality content, so your efforts are greatly appreciated. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 22:45, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks AR. Zawed (talk) 01:34, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at The Lost Boys of Anzac Op-ed: Peacemaker67 on Featured Articles involving Yugoslavia in World War II

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Francis Morphet Twisleton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Māori (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

G'day cobber, you might like to re-insert that other article you had out up. It appears we are running with C-Class and below being self-assessed for the contest. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 08:39, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks dude, looks like you already re-inserted the article. Cheers for that. Zawed (talk) 06:40, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at life aboard a US aircraft carrier and Hawkeye7 considers the role of food in World War II

Thanks for creating Walter McKinnon, Zawed!

Wikipedia editor GELongstreet just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

WW2 section could need more details.

To reply, leave a comment on GELongstreet's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jack Lyon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Captain (rank) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Jonas Vinther and Nick-D look at examples of electronic media Op-ed: TomStar81 on the shot heard around the world

Hi Zawed, I'd like to invite you to participate in a group interview in the upcoming August issue of the Military History Wikiproject's newsletter, The Bugle, with editors who work on articles concerning World War I. We're conducting this interview to mark the centenary of the war, and it forms part of a semi-regular series of interviews on thematic topics. If you're able to participate, I'd be grateful if you could post responses to the questions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/News/August 2014/Interview by next Sunday 17 July. Please let me know if you have any questions about this. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 10:24, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I meant 10 August, not 17 July. I shouldn't be typing anything with a heavy cold! Nick-D (talk) 01:18, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Wrap-up of some recent external reviews Interview: World War I editors Op-ed: TomStar81 on the outbreak of World War I

Thank you, I liked it (and added a couple of flourishes) RegardsKeith-264 (talk) 12:42, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback Keith-264, glad you liked it. It was a bit of a challenge as I've only done a couple of battle type articles but this one is easily the most detailed. Thanks for the tweaks you made as well, I totally forgot to do the distance conversions. Cheers. Zawed (talk) 07:49, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I find that putting an article in for a B class is the best way of getting a fresh pair of eyes to look things over. I'm redoing 1st Ypres but that's saddled me with three new articles, as well as the last two on the Race to the Sea. It just growed ;O)Keith-264 (talk) 08:07, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Patrick Bugden, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Australian Imperial Force and Victory Medal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw your new page and thought I'd add my congratulations. Added a couple of flourishes too.Keith-264 (talk) 09:55, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Keith - I'd noticed you had already made some tweaks! Cheers. Zawed (talk) 10:00, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Capture of Le Quesnoy (1918) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AustralianRupert -- AustralianRupert (talk) 05:02, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at the military history of Austria-Hungary Timeleine: This month in World War I

The article Capture of Le Quesnoy (1918) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Capture of Le Quesnoy (1918) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AustralianRupert -- AustralianRupert (talk) 20:22, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Charles Heaphy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jonas Vinther -- Jonas Vinther (talk) 19:40, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Charles Heaphy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Charles Heaphy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jonas Vinther -- Jonas Vinther (talk) 20:25, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Philomel (1890) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jonas Vinther -- Jonas Vinther (talk) 19:02, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article HMS Philomel (1890) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Philomel (1890) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jonas Vinther -- Jonas Vinther (talk) 19:42, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Nick-D on Britain in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D on Britain in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars Timeline: This month in World War I

		September-October 2014 backlog reduction drive
		By order of the Military history WikiProject coordinators, for placing third in the WikiProject's September–October 2014 backlog reduction drive, I hereby award you this Bronze Wiki. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 05:33, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

		WikiChevrons
		By order of the Military history WikiProject coordinators, for your contributions to the WikiProject's September–October 2014 backlog reduction drive, I hereby award you this Military history WikiProject award. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 05:33, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks mate. You didn't do too badly yourself! Zawed (talk) 06:43, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Zawed. I notice you have a prodigious record on New Zealand-focused MilHist articles, so was wondering if you could spend the time to contribute to my peer review of Dave Gallaher here. Any feedback at all would be appreciated. Thanks. -- Shudde ^talk 06:52, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gidday Shudde, I will have a good look at the article shortly but in the meantime I have had a quick look at the military sections and a few things stand out. Ranks shouldn't be capitalised unless being used as a title; i.e "Sergeant Gallaher" is OK but "Gallaher was promoted to Sergeant" is not. In the WWI section, you have two different enlistment dates. The medals are service medals (like his Boer War medals), the way it is written suggests they are gallantry awards. As I say, I will have a closer look over the whole article later and will leave comments on the peer review page. Zawed (talk) 07:20, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey thanks for that. I'd never have known the capitalisation thing! -- Shudde ^talk 21:49, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Nazi Germany's Eastern Front allies Op-ed: TomStar81 on the origins and legacy of trench warfare Timeline: This month in World War I

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 18th Battalion (New Zealand) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AustralianRupert -- AustralianRupert (talk) 10:42, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article 18th Battalion (New Zealand) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:18th Battalion (New Zealand) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AustralianRupert -- AustralianRupert (talk) 21:22, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:36, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 on armoured reconnaissance and German scientists, Nick-D on time travelling historians Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the World War I Christmas truce Timeline: This month in World War I

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cyril Bassett you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 23:21, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Cyril Bassett you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Cyril Bassett for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 08:20, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Cyril Bassett you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cyril Bassett for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 03:21, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article New Zealand Division you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 00:21, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article New Zealand Division you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:New Zealand Division for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 14:00, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to New Zealand Division may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• a front of ((convert|80|km|mi)). The Allies were quickly pushed back and a gap formed between the [[[[Third Army (United Kingdom)|Third]] and [[Fifth Army (United Kingdom)|Fifth Armies]] through

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:58, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Zealand Division, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Māori (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article New Zealand Division you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:New Zealand Division for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 11:41, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Jonas Vinther on Hitler and Cliftonian on the Rhodesia Regiment Interview: 2014 Military History Newcomer Award nominees Review essay: Nick-D on the Australian War Memorial Op-ed: TomStar81 on the birth of strategic bombing Timeline: This month in World War I

		The Military history A-Class medal
		On behalf of the coordinators of the Military History Wikiproject, I am pleased to award you the A-Class Medal to recognise your great work developing the William George Malone, Frank Worsley, and New Zealand Division articles to A-Class status. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 00:37, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks mate! Zawed (talk) 04:31, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		Military history reviewers' award
		For completing 4 reviews during October–December 2014, on behalf of the Wikiproject Military History coordinators, I hereby award you the Military history reviewers' award. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 23:25, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply] Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste ((WPMILHIST Review alerts)) to your user space

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Keith Elliott you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:20, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

G'day, Zawed, I came across this article the other day: Divisional Cavalry Regiment (New Zealand). Not sure if you've seen it, but it might be up your alley. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 00:12, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I've seen that. The main editor is still working on it but I will take a good look at it once he/she is done. Cheers. Zawed (talk) 03:39, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Keith Elliott you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Keith Elliott for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:01, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Nick-D on the British Pacific Fleet Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the advent of chemical warfare Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Review essay: Nick-D on the Australian Fleet Air Arm Museum Op-ed: TomStar81 on submarine warfare in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Minardi M191 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Goodyear

Minardi M192 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Goodyear

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the landing at Anzac Cove Op-ed: TomStar81 on the debut of poison gas in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

		Military history reviewers' award
		For completing 4 reviews during January-March 2015, on behalf of the Wikiproject Military History coordinators, I hereby award you the Wikistripes. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 09:23, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply] Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste ((WPMILHIST Review alerts)) to your user space

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 and Simon Harley on the sinking of the Lusitania Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 on the new technology of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Review essay: Nick-D on sourcing articles about bombing a battleship Op-ed: TomStar81 on the role of nursing in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D on the Second Schleswig War Interview: Featured picture participants Op-ed: TomStar81 on Indian nationalism during World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

G'day, mate, haven't seen you on Wiki for awhile, so I hope everything is well. Anyway, quick question: I was having a look at the ((Anzac)) template, and pretty much all of the units have articles now, which is great to see. One stands out, though, for not having an article: 2nd Infantry Brigade (New Zealand). If you are looking for a project, I wonder if you would be interested in taking this on? The work you did on the New Zealand Division article was fantastic. I'd be happy to help in any way I can. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 07:26, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AR, all well here, just been on a bit of a wikibreak as the real world was catching up on me! I'll take a look at the 2nd Brigade but probably don't have the resources for its post WWI history where I think it was a Territorial formation. Cheers. Zawed (talk) 10:20, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, mate. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 09:36, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors, coordinator elections have begun Articles: Abbasids to a Yugoslav monitor Book reviews: Economics of warfare, Japan, and light horse Op-ed: We can (not) advance Timeline: This month in World War I

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Anotherclown and Sturmvogel 66 on war in the air and at sea Review essay: Auntieruth55 on the French Revolutionary Wars Op-ed: TomStar81 on the entry of Bulgaria in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Battle of the Bulge Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the collapse of the Serbian Army in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the German retreat from France in 1944 Op-ed: TomStar81 on empires of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fred Waite (politician) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ian Rose -- Ian Rose (talk) 08:41, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Fred Waite (politician) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fred Waite (politician) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ian Rose -- Ian Rose (talk) 11:21, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on Jefferson Davis; Hawkeye7 on Australia's war in Vietnam Op-ed: TomStar81 discusses British World War I conscription Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on nuclear weapons in Britain and Nick-D on Australia's war in the Pacific Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the Kamurun Campaign of 1914–16 Timeline: This month in World War I

Thanks for the review, I addressed your comments. Cheers MisterBee1966 (talk) 11:11, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lindsay Merritt Inglis you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Khanate General -- Khanate General (talk) 22:41, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lindsay Merritt Inglis you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lindsay Merritt Inglis for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Khanate General -- Khanate General (talk) 06:21, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Reginald Miles you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ian Rose -- Ian Rose (talk) 07:41, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Reginald Miles you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Reginald Miles for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ian Rose -- Ian Rose (talk) 07:41, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nice article. Dapi89 (talk) 13:06, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jack Hinton you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ian Rose -- Ian Rose (talk) 10:00, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review: Hawkeye7 discusses a Panzer general and a "mercenary mum" Op-ed: TomStar81 on the terrible battles of 1916 Timeline: This month in World War I

The article Jack Hinton you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jack Hinton for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ian Rose -- Ian Rose (talk) 10:41, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I addressed your comments, thanks for your time MisterBee1966 (talk) 06:35, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

		The WikiChevrons
		On behalf of the WikiProject Military history coordinators, I hereby award you this for your contribution of 16 FA, A-Class, Peer and/or GA reviews during the period January to March 2016. Thank you for your efforts! Anotherclown (talk) 10:48, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australian spies, Nick-D on the German Army Op-ed: TomStar81 on the 1916 Easter Rising Timeline: This month in World War I

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John Evelyn Duigan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ian Rose -- Ian Rose (talk) 23:01, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article John Evelyn Duigan you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:John Evelyn Duigan for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ian Rose -- Ian Rose (talk) 14:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australian spies (part two) Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the Battle of Jutland Timeline: Events of World War I

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jordan 191, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marlboro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hugh Stewart (classical scholar) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ian Rose -- Ian Rose (talk) 08:40, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the Australian Imperial Force Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the Battle of the Somme Timeline: This month in World War I

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Second Battle of Bapaume, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British Expeditionary Force (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hugh Stewart (classical scholar) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hugh Stewart (classical scholar) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ian Rose -- Ian Rose (talk) 11:21, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, you are hereby awarded the Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for reviewing a total of 7 Milhist articles during the period March to June 2016. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:22, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply] Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste ((WPMILHIST Review alerts)) to your user space

The article Graham Beresford Parkinson you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Graham Beresford Parkinson for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:02, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at disease control and defence satellites Op-ed: TomStar81 on the rise of air power Timeline: This month in World War I

The article George Spafford Richardson you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:George Spafford Richardson for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 01:40, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Horace Millichamp Moore-Jones, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ian Hamilton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Leonard Thornton you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 14:41, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Leonard Thornton you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Leonard Thornton for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 10:41, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

G'day, Zawed, as you may be aware, the nomination phase of the Milhist co-ord elections has begun. No pressure, but I would like to encourage you to consider running. I believe that you have the experience and knowledge, and you have been active in many areas of the project so I believe that you would stand a good chance of being successful and would make a fantastic addition to the co-ord team. If you have any questions about the role please let me know. You can nominate here, if you are keen: Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators/September 2016. Anyway, all the best. Hope you are having a nice relaxing weekend on your side of the Tasman. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 06:19, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here, here! I also think you would be a great addition to the coord team. Regards, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:42, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aw shucks, you're making me blush. Thanks for the nudge, but I'm not sure if I have a firm enough grip on WP policies to be really effective. I will still give it some consideration though. Cheers. Zawed (talk) 04:43, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Peacemaker67 and Nick-D on Nazi terror and covert warfare Op-ed: Hawkeye7 looks at Australians on the Somme Timeline: This month in World War I

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In recognition of your first ever successful election as a co-ordinator of the Military History Project, I have the great honor of presenting you with these co-ord stars. I wish you luck in the coming year. TomStar81 (Talk) 00:09, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at recent works Op-ed: TomStar81 on the evolution of the tank Timeline: This month in World War I

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eduard Hauser (soldier), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

		Military history service award
		On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, you are hereby awarded the WikiChevrons for reviewing a total of seven Milhist articles at PR, GAN, ACR or FAC during the period July to September 2016. Thank you for your ongoing support of Wikipedia's reviewing processes. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 12:20, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zawed, every so often the editors of the Milhist newsletter, the Bugle, run an interview with members of the project. For the November 2016 issue, we'd like to present a chat with the first-time coordinators from the September elections. We'd love you to participate -- the interview page is here. We always like to get the Bugle out by the 7th of the month, so allowing for some tidy-up before despatch, if you could complete your answers within two weeks, i.e. around 2nd November, that'd be great. Thanks/cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 07:49, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zawed, did you want to take part in the interview? You can have another couple of days if you need 'em... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 07:18, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ian, I did intend to do this but it slipped my mind until your reminder. I have added my responses now. Cheers. Zawed (talk) 09:11, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:04, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zawed. You have new messages at Talk:Jadunath Singh/GA1.
Message added 12:41, 28 October 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Please have a look at the article after the improvements. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:41, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Keith Lindsay Stewart you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 02:20, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Robert Logan (politician) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 02:21, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Keith Lindsay Stewart you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Keith Lindsay Stewart for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 07:20, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Keith Lindsay Stewart you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Keith Lindsay Stewart for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 02:41, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Robert Logan (politician) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Robert Logan (politician) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 15:20, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at two new books on the US military Interview: A chat with our new project coordinators Review essay: Nick-D discusses recent works on the British and Australian Armies in World War I Op-ed: TomStar81 on the end of the Battle of the Somme Timeline: This month in World War I

The article Robert Logan (politician) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Robert Logan (politician) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 12:21, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zawed. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

		Editor of the Week
		Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week for extensive work in military history. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:Krishna Chaitanya Velaga submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

I nominate Zawed to be Editor of the Week. Zawed is one of the most well-known editors from military history topic area. His work goes as follows: created around 118 articles (which are mostly of B-class or higher), 8 A-class articles, more than 30 good articles and 4 articles were featured on DYK. Besides these, he regularly helps out with the reviewing processes, especially the GANs, and also at WikiProject Military history A-class review. One of his appreciated aspect is that while reviewing the GA nominations, he not only gives out suggestions but also help the nominator(s) by cleaning up the article himself to some extent, if needed. He was a nominee for the 2013 "Military historian of the Year" award. Presently, he is offering his services as a coordinator to the Military history project.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

((subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient user box))

Thanks again for your efforts! Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 19:21, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]