Wolfgang Clement has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 15, 2021. (Reviewed version).

A news item involving Wolfgang Clement was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 28 September 2020.

This article was edited to contain a total or partial translation of Wolfgang Clement from the German Wikipedia. Consult the history of the original page to see a list of its authors.

A fact from Wolfgang Clement appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 April 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that German minister Wolfgang Clement said that the secret to drinking a glass of beer in 1.5 seconds was to fold back the uvula? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wolfgang Clement.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as High-importance). Germany High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Socialism This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article was created or improved during WikiProject Europe's "European 10,000 Challenge", which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help out!

...is not an "internship". It's a major part of vocational training in Germany and has little to do with the notion of being an "unpaid intern", as many might think. Maybe someone can clean this up, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.208.106.150 (talk) 15:04, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Among the notion that he was a successful politician (which he was objectively not), he had used the media to insult the long-time unemployed openly and insisted a hunt on "lazy" receivers of the ALG II (commonly known as "Hartz IV") together with then-chancellor Schröder.

Though being reported to justice various times for slandering, he got away without any prosecution which can be a considered a justice scandal.

--2A02:560:4272:1200:8021:39B3:A088:AA56 (talk) 16:38, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Wolfgang Clement/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: LM150 (talk · contribs) 23:42, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments to come shortly! Thanks, LM150 23:42, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An interesting read overall! Here are my comments and feedback:

• Are citations necessary in the lede section? The lede should summarise the article anyway, so they're usually not needed. No pressure to change this.

•  Done

• "Clement subsequently worked as an.." - 'subsequently' is not needed

• Partly done. I was trying to tie this to the previous paragraph to show continuity. Changed it to "later". But, if I need to make any other change, please feel free to let me know. Thanks.

• "Post the state elections.." - perhaps "After the state elections" sounds better and clearer (I recommend changing it everywhere it is used)

•  Done

• "There were questions if this decision was compatible.." - perhaps "There were doubts if this was compatible" sounds better

•  Done

• "10 March 1999 to 22 March 1999" - no need to repeat month and year: "between 10 and 22 March 1999"

•  Done

• "engine of structural change" - avoid using idioms

• Partly done. Moved this text into double quotes to indicate that this was the phrase that was directly used. However, if you think I should change, please let me know. Thanks.

• "became the symbol receiving 50 million Euros" - what does it mean by symbol? And you should probably use the Euro currency symbol.

•  Done edited / clarified. Added the Euro currency symbol

• "came up with the Agenda 2010 series of reforms where the economy was given more freedom, and labor market reforms starting with the Hartz I through IV reforms were introduced" - I suggest rewording this as you have used "reforms" three times in this sentence

•  Done

• "He subsequently went on to support" - no need for "subsequently"

•  Done

• Spelling - are you happy with the article using American English? eg. Labor, canceled, favor. (I was leaning towards British English but no pressure to change this)

• I ended up using American English, since that came naturally to me. Given that there is no specific guidance for German articles, we can let this be. But, please let me know if you think otherwise. Thanks.

• Two external links are not working. Are these needed?

•  Done Removed one and replaced one from Internet Archive. Can drop the one from Internet archive as well, if needed

• I noticed in the German article for Clement, there are some details about his business interests after politics. Is it worth including some more info here?

• I had summarized this and the positions had been listed as bullets, which seems alright, but, please feel free to let me know if you'd want any other text brought in. Cheers.

Thanks, LM150 14:18, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Greetings LM150. Many thanks for this review, and the very thoughtful comments. I have take a pass at addressing most of them, and my edits are included inline above. Passing the baton back to you for any additional changes that you'd want incorporated. Thanks again. Have a wonderful week ahead. Ktin (talk) 01:31, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  Great, I just did a quick source check and made some minor copyedits. Passing now! LM150 19:53, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]