The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:03, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

AirTrain JFK

[edit]
An AirTrain vehicle
An AirTrain vehicle

Improved to Good Article status by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 21:46, 9 October 2017 (UTC).

Substantial, well-researched Good article, no copyvio obvious. Just qpq missing, and biblio 8 and 9 are not used. The image is licensed and would draw more attention to a fine article. I like ALT2 best, short and sweet ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:56, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
@Gerda Arendt: Thank you for the review and sorry for the lack of response. I prefer ALT2 as well. I will do a QPQ within the next few days. epicgenius (talk) 22:22, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
@Gerda Arendt: I've done my QPQ now. epicgenius (talk) 15:58, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Thank you! - The two refs are still not used, intentionally? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:38, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
I'll find a use for these two sources soon. But no, they are not used. You can feel free to put them into further reading if this is an issue, since I don't know if I should keep them in the Bibliography section. (They are part of a 3-volume report; Volume 1 is used, while Volume 2 and 3 aren't). epicgenius (talk) 20:19, 22 October 2017 (UTC)