The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 16:15, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Central Park

The Pond in Central Park
The Pond in Central Park

Improved to Good Article status by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 14:32, 5 September 2019 (UTC).

  • Length and currency: Easily long enough, achieved Good article status today (5 Sept)
  • Sources: Extremely well referenced.
  • CopyVio: I can't find anything out of order, and I assume it has been checked for this as part of the GA review in any case.
  • Image: Properly licenced
  • QPQ: Done
  • Hook: Approving ALT0. It's snappy and surprising. Clearly written in the text. The source, page 17 of Kinead (1990) cannot be read online, so AGF.
  • General: A very thorough article, written in crystal clear English, nicely laid out, very good use of images. Well done! Felixkrater (talk) 18:50, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Hi, I came by to promote this, and I don't find ALT0 snappy or surprising at all, considering it happened in the mid-19th century. I would like to promote ALT2, but I would like to use a different thumbnail image, as this one shows too much of the skyscrapers while the pond is in darkness. Pinging nominator Epicgenius. Yoninah (talk) 22:35, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Yoninah, both the proposed image and the use of ALT2 would be fine to me. epicgenius (talk) 01:49, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Central Park
Central Park
  • Thank you. ALT2 hook ref verified and cited inline. Image is freely licensed. Rest of review per Felixkrater. ALT2 good to go. Yoninah (talk) 14:08, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
@Yoninah: In my view, ALT0 is much more hooky than ALT2, and I am unclear what you mean in the statement "considering it happened in the mid-19th century". The two events occurred about a dozen years apart and the Alaska purchase was the later of the two, making the statistic more impressive. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:58, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your opinion, Cwmhiraeth. I'd still like to use the second image. Yoninah (talk) 15:04, 19 September 2019 (UTC)