The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 13:33, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Cynthia Propper Seton[edit]

5x expanded by Yoninah (talk). Self-nominated at 23:49, 12 August 2017 (UTC).

  • the article is long enough, is neutral, contains no close paraphrasing or copyvio (43.8% from [1] from two quotes from the subject), the hook is neutral, short enough, interesting, is properly sourced with an inline source citation, the article itself is adequately sourced and written in adequate English --Elisa.rolle (talk) 00:49, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  • @Elisa.rolle: thank you for your review. When you are able to access the online source, please use a green tick instead of a gray one. The gray one is for sources you cannot access. Thanks again, Yoninah (talk) 14:44, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  • fine for me, I thought grey was for DYK with just one, trascurable, issue. Elisa.rolle (talk) 14:58, 15 August 2017 (UTC)