- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Yoninah (talk) 21:33, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Sourcing and hook issues unaddressed. I also tagged the lead for inadequate summary and unencyclopedic writing.
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Embassy chapel
[edit]
- ... that chapels of the embassies of Bavaria, France, Sardinia and other Catholic nations in London provided religious services to persecuted English Catholics before Catholic emancipation? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
- ALT1:... that throughout history, embassy chapels, protected by international law, have provided religious services in host countries to otherwise persecuted religions? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
Created/expanded by Eccekevin (talk). Self-nominated at 19:01, 29 June 2018 (UTC).
The nominator has not edited in almost a month, and some of the article issues remain unaddressed. As these issues are minor, I won't mark this nomination for closure, but I'm calling on another editor to adopt this nomination and make the necessary changes. Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 12:10, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5:I've done some copy-editing. The opening words remain a bit funky, but otherwise I hope this is adequate. ~ Maltrópa loquace 01:20, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- I have corrected some typos in the lede and now it should be good Eccekevin (talk) 23:19, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
It appears that the writing issues are resolved, so it's time for a full review. The article is new enough and long enough at the time of creation, and is adequately sourced. No close paraphrasing was detected. Offline sources are accepted in good faith. This is the nominator's first nomination so no QPQ is necessary. My concern is that neither hook is described directly in the article text. Furthermore, ALT1 (which would have been my preferred hook), is only mentioned in the lede and is unreferenced. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:27, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- The first paragraph of §Catholic Embassies in London also has no inline citation. › Mortee talk 12:47, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
The nominator has not edited in almost two weeks, and the sourcing and hook issues have not been addressed. Unless another editor is willing to adopt this nomination, this is now marked for closure as stale. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:09, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
