The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:17, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

John Hulett

Created by Puchku (talk). Self-nominated at 06:53, 16 February 2020 (UTC).

  • Hi, I noticed this is a good candidate for running during Black History Month. New enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. Image is freely-licensed. Hook is interesting, verified, and cited inline. No QPQ needed for nominator with less than 5 DYK credits.
  • The only thing that looks strange is the referencing. I did some formatting of the refs and notice that you have a lot of duplicate citations. You may want to use Harvard footnotes and add a Bibliography section to keep the References section tidy. The Jeffries cite in particular looks like the same book with two different dates. That can be fixed up with WP:Citation templates. Please let me know. Yoninah (talk) 20:01, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Hi! Thanks so much for your feedback Yoninah. I've switched the recurring references to harvard footnotes and added a bibliography section. Let me know what you think. Puchku (talk) 22:30, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Thank you! There are a few more book sources to add to the Bibliography, but that shouldn't hold up this nomination. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 22:52, 20 February 2020 (UTC)