The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 02:01, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Penelope (platypus)

Created by Crunchydillpickle (talk). Self-nominated at 06:53, 13 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Penelope (platypus); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: Article moved to mainspace on 13 May, and is well beyond the required minimum length. All sources are, as far as I can tell, reliable for the material they are cited for—though I have not been able to access all of them. Earwig reveals no overt copyvio, but there is some WP:Close paraphrasing. There are no obvious neutrality issues. Both hooks are interesting; I prefer ALT0. ALT0 has a problem with "zoologists" (see below); ALT1 I would have to WP:AGF on as I can't access the cited source. This is the nominator's first nomination, so they are QPQ exempt. Some comments about the content:

Ping Crunchydillpickle. TompaDompa (talk) 23:16, 13 May 2023 (UTC)