The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by feminist (talk) 10:33, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Article completely ineligible

US-Bangla Airlines Flight 211

The aircraft involved, photographed in 2014

• ... that just before it crashed, US-Bangla Airlines Flight 211 narrowly missed buildings and parked aircraft at the airport in Kathmandu, Nepal? Source: "Video shows US Bangla plane crashing at TIA", The Kathmandu Post, 6 April 2019
  • ALT1:... that the pilot of US-Bangla Airlines Flight 211 that crashed in Kathmandu, Nepal, was fatigued and harboring severe mental stress before he performed an unsafe airport to the airport? Source: Accident report
  • ALT2:... that the Bangladeshi representative on the accident commission investigating the crash of US-Bangla Airlines Flight 211 in Kathmandu, Nepal, said that the accident could have been avoided if the air traffic controllers had done their job correctly? Source: "US-Bangla flight 211 probe report: Nepal, Bangladesh investigators differ on crash cause", Dhaka Tribune 28 January 2018.
  • ALT3:... that the crash of US-Bangla Airlines Flight 211 in Kathmandu, Nepal, was the deadliest accident involving a Bangladeshi airline? Source: "US-Bangla plane crash: New details shed light on confusions at Kathmandu airport", BD News 24, 14 March 2018.
  • ALT4:... that as the pilot of US-Bangla Airlines Flight 211 attempted to land at Kathmandu, he narrowly missed the domestic passenger terminal and air traffic controllers in the tower ducked down in fear? Source: Accident report

Improved to Good Article status by RecycledPixels (talk). Self-nominated at 00:24, 24 September 2019 (UTC).

• This article is a newly promoted GA and is new enough and long enough. I have struck two of the proposed hooks but the remaining hooks are satisfactory, apart from ALT4 which is marginally too long and needs trimming. The image is appropriately licensed, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright or plagiarism issues (Earwig gave a high score but it seemed to me that other sites had copied the Wikipedia article). A QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:55, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

• Sorry, but this nomination is ineligible per WP:DYK#Eligibility criteria 1. d., as it appeared on the main page in a bolded link under In the News on March 12, 2018. Yoninah (talk) 22:13, 6 October 2019 (UTC)