Merge | ||||
|
Deletion (defunct) | ||||
|
On 9 June 2023, it was proposed that this page be moved. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
Template:Afd-merged-from is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should be proposed here first. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use ((edit template-protected)) to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here. |
Three events are related to this template:
I propose that optional parameters be added to properly record (3). ((Copied)) is a relatively new template that provides attribution information for copied content. Flatscan (talk) 03:17, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Does anyone know how long this template should remain on a talk page for following a AFD merger? In most cases its likely that such mergers will be of small amounts of information which can easily fit into the place of another article. Is there a need to keep the template on the talk page in such circumstances?, it seems excessive for what is basically just a redirect. BritishWatcher (talk) 19:13, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change "The debate" to "The discussion" for consistency with all other talk page templates. wumbolo ^^^ 21:15, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Is there a template designed to include/list multiple instances of merges from other articles in this way, like ((Old XfD multi)) does for AfDs of the article itself? (That template can't be used for this purpose, since it only mentions the article it's on being nominated for deletion, not for another article being AfD-ed and merged into the current article.) Many D&D articles especially tend to have had multiple articles merged into them, so it gets a bit cluttered to have 4+ instances of the ((Merged-from)) or ((Afd-merged-from)) templates at the top. V2Blast (talk) 23:21, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
((Banner holder |collapsed=yes |text=Content from multiple pages has been merged into this article through the [[Articles for deletion]] process. |image=Mergefrom.svg |size=48 |1=
, add the various ((Merged-from)) templates on separate lines below that, and then close the banner holder with ))
. I just did this on Talk:Features of the Marvel Universe and while not perfect, I think it helps. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 14:37, 10 July 2023 (UTC)The result of the move request was: no consensus. Minimal participation after two relists. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 10:34, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
– These templates' names should have standardized hyphens, though I'm not sure what to standardize it to. I would personally recommend replacing all of them with spaces, but I'm not sure if there's a naming convention for hyphens. Additionally, while this is not a discussion for this venue, is there a reason at least the first two aren't merged? Aaron Liu (talk) 00:39, 9 June 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 00:59, 16 June 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 18:26, 23 June 2023 (UTC)