The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

It was proposed in this section that Template:English language sidebar be renamed and moved to Template:English language. result: Not moved. See below that there is some controversy connected with this contested move request. There seems to be wide usage of "sidebar" in the titles of sidebar templates. So there is no title change for now. Kudos to all editors for your input, and Happy, Healthy Publishing! (nac by page mover) P.I. Ellsworth - ed. put'r there 18:33, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply] Links: current log • target log This is template ((subst:Requested move/end))

Template:English language sidebar → Template:English language – because someone didn't move ((English language)) back to ((History of English)) and ((English language (version 2))) and their respective talk pages properly today. PK2 (talk) 09:12, 12 September 2021 (UTC)— Relisting. —usernamekiran (talk) 14:29, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:37, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @PK2 and Sdrqaz: queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:39, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  @PK2: This appears to be a controversial change, given the comments by BilCat. Sdrqaz (talk) 17:02, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  The reason I'm requesting a move back to ((English language)) is because I didn't realise my previous move request would be controversial, so this one shouldn't be. --PK2 (talk) 20:09, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  @PK2, Sdrqaz, and BilCat: this has been sitting at the bottom of the RM queue for a while - are there any remaining objections to this move? Elli (talk | contribs) 15:20, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  Seems like pings don't work when starting RMs ... strange. My objection was purely procedural, as RMT should only be used for uncontroversial requests: I believe there were comments by BilCat somewhere, but now I cannot find it. Sdrqaz (talk) 15:23, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]