Civil engineering NA‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles NA This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Highways Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways articles Template This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.

I have proof that the Arial font can be used in road signs in Russia and the CIS countries instead of the GOST 10807-78 font. Road sign standards adopted in Russia and the CIS countries permit the use of the Arial font. For example there are images from the Internet: Russia Kazakhstan Azerbaijan DIN 1451 vs GOST 10807-78

In general, the Arial font is used in road signs in almost all CIS countries, especially, in the CIS countries which use Cyrillic and/or Latin script as the writing of the official language WWBM (talk) 09:10, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since the stoplights don't have their own navbox yet, shouldn't we make a make a template (and navbox) for them?

Here is what I've come up of:

2600:1700:6180:6290:9DF4:436E:5E7F:66B (talk) 23:47, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2600:1700:6180:6290:9DF4:436E:5E7F:66B (talk) 23:35, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Imzadi 1979 → 23:38, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is neither a template/navbox for Traffic control; Road surface markings; Traffic lights; or temporary, school, or rail traffic control. 2600:1700:6180:6290:9DF4:436E:5E7F:66B (talk) 23:35, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Not everything needs a navbox. In this case, I would say we don't need one because we don't have all of these separate articles. Once again, you can save your time and energy and stop expanding the example here because it won't be implemented. Imzadi 1979 → 14:05, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]