WikiProject Computing (Rated Template-class)
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
WikiProject Writing systems (Rated Template-class)
This template falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.

Linguistic transcription

I am trying to figure out what would be (an) appropriate place(s) to collect together linguistic transcription templates such as Template:IPA, Template:PIE, Template:UPA. Would this meta-template be suitable? --Trɔpʏliʊmblah 13:41, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[]

They're not particularly unicode templates though. They are as you note linguistic but that's not the same, and there are many more than just those. The documentation for Template:IPA collects together a large number of IPA related ones. Apart from that they're categorised in hopefully logical ways, and linked from various pages such as relevant project and guideline pages.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 14:42, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[]


Having forgotten the name of ((Contains special characters)), I expected to find it listed here. It is not but it seems to me that it should. Is there a good reason for this? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 21:49, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[]

Good point. Add a group (row) "wiki related"? There also exists ((PUA)). And MOS:PUA. -DePiep (talk) 12:54, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[]