This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mescad/Presbyterian_Buddhism. |
A question was left on my talk page back in March, in response to my adding user boxes for both Presbyterian and Buddism to my User page. User:TimNelson wrote, "How can you be a Presbyterian Buddhist (ie. I thought they were mutually exclusive)? Just interested :)" I have been trying to decide the best way to put my beliefs into words, and this is what I have come up with. This document was written over the past 6-7 months, but the beliefs conveyed in it have been formed gradually over the past 5-10 years.
Hi Tim, thanks for asking. I don't believe that Buddhism and Presbyterianism are mutually exclusive. I will attempt to convey the main idea here:
First I must deal with the label that was given. Is a Presbyterian Buddhist the same as a Buddhist Presbyterian? If one day I met a man who was blind and a jogger, I might call him a "blind jogger" or a "jogging blind person." The first label implies that he is a jogger who happens to be also blind, just as he might also be a "tall jogger" or a "fat jogger." If I instead called him a "jogging blind person" I might be implying that he is blind, and happens to be jogging right now. The same man might also be a "cooking blind person" or a "sleeping blind person" at other times in his life. So, if being a jogger and being blind are equally relevant to the man's personality, then either label fits. However, if one or the other is more relevant, the choice of label is important. I consider myself to be primarily a Presbyterian (Christian who follows Presbyterianism if you want to get technical), who practices his beliefs by following Buddhism. Therefore I prefer the label "Buddhist Presbyterian" over “Presbyterian Buddhist.”
The simplistic way to explain my belief is that I believe that the Kingdom of God, which Jesus referred to in the New Testament, is what Buddhism calls Enlightenment. In the New Testament, Jesus describes the Kingdom of God in many ways. For example, He says that it is within people (Luke 17:20-21), that it is somehow achieved through, or at least connected with, understanding (Mark 12:34), and is available to those who put the will of God into practice (Matthew 7:21). When comparing the description of the Kingdom of God to the Buddhist concept of Enlightenment, I came to the understanding (belief) that they were one in the same. I believe that Jesus Christ may have been a bodhisattva, enlightened, and chosen by God to assist all of humanity into the Kingdom of God.
In practice I attempt to follow the Way of Christ (John 14:5-6) through the Middle Way of Buddhism. The Four Noble Truths and the Eight-fold path are my guide, and Jesus is my example. As a Presbyterian, I confess that I certainly do not know everything about the nature of God, and I allow for the possibility that I may be wrong. Since Buddhism is a non-theistic religion (some say it's a "philosophy" and not a religion at all) I see no conflict between the two (i.e. they aren't mutually exclusive).
The Four Noble Truths are fundamental beliefs of Buddhism, and are sometimes translated like this:
So now the Eight-fold path must be defined. These fall into three categories, and are defined like this:
Wisdom
Ethical Conduct
Mental Discipline
This is my understanding of what each means and how it is compatible with the Way of Christ.
That is my understanding of how the two fit well together. I have been told that the author Thich Nhat Hanh has written several books on this topic that I would be interested in, including Living Buddha, Living Christ. I independently came to these beliefs after learning about what Buddhists really believe, but have since learned that there are a lot of Christians who believe in some form of Buddhism. Philosophy calls this sort of belief, where more than one religion offers some version of the truth, "Religious pluralism," or "Cafeteria Pluralism" as it was called in my introductory Philosophy class. In fact, the last paragraph of the Buddhism section of the wikipedia article on religious pluralism specifically mentions Christianity as not mutually exclusive with Buddhism, so it's hardly a new idea. :)
I welcome feedback, criticism, refutation, or any discussion by anyone interested in this topic. Please add that on the Talk page, and if you convince me or help me refine my views, I'll update this page.