Welcome! Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your host, 80-44-155-133.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (80.44.155.133), is part of a pool of dynamically allocated addresses and is registered to TalkTalk Communications Limited. It may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. (Note: Sometimes, due to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to register). Applying an indefinite block to this IP is not appropriate, unless it is a soft block, because the IP address will later be reallocated to a different, unrelated, and unsuspecting user, thereby impairing access to Wikipedia in an inappropriate fashion. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. The best approach is to determine the CIDR IP numerical address range and make a higher-level decision to soft-block the entire range. http://www.arin.net/ (for approximately North America) and related sites can help to identify that range. Caution is advised when applying a range block as other Wikipedians, both registered and otherwise, may be affected. In the event of vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports can be sent to its network administrator for investigation. Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges. Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block. Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log

Hello, I'm DreamRimmer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Gujrat District, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DreamRimmer (talk) 14:47, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Badis ibn Habus, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. R Prazeres (talk) 00:22, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question for you here Talk:Defence of Festubert Regards Keith-264 (talk) 18:25, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ogress. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ali Kemal have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Ogress 11:13, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nureddin Pasha, you may be blocked from editing. ButterCashier (talk) 11:14, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as you did with this edit to Mir Dast. SHB2000 (talk) 13:02, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Heavy Water. I noticed that you recently removed content from Battle of the Somme without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Heavy Water (talk • contribs) 20:57, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Darwan Singh Negi, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Xeverything11 (talk) 15:08, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mir Dast, you may be blocked from editing. DreamRimmer (talk) 09:53, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Fazal Din. Materialscientist (talk) 10:52, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Mir Khalifa—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 10:55, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Andranik. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- Prodraxis^talk_contribs 00:22, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to engage in subtle vandalism by making unexplained changes to information, as you did at 2018 Tajikistan tourist attack, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedialuva (talk) 21:04, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Netley Hospital, you may be blocked from editing. 10mmsocket (talk) 09:40, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Afshar people. - LouisAragon (talk) 23:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. You've been warned many times about Verifiability, but at Siege of Tripolitsa you changed a quote from a source in order to change its meaning. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  DrKay (talk) 16:08, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Sadeq Khan Shaqaqi, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:08, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• @DrKay: They're still persistently at it, unfortunately, i.e.[1]-[2] Textbook WP:NOTHERE IMO (adding unsourced content, promoting ethnicities, never replying to warnings, continuing with the same sort of stuff after the block ended, etc.). - LouisAragon (talk) 17:57, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Tahmasp II. - LouisAragon (talk) 18:03, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  Daniel Case (talk) 19:15, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  Daniel Case (talk) 20:42, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]