Template:Talk page info

Hello, I'm Nigos. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Quantum mechanics, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nigos (t@lk • Contribs) 08:10, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ATZNA! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi @User:ChrisTheDude, I noticed your edits(comments) on my infoboxes - would you know how to import or/and link wikidata to the english-wikipedia within a infobox? For say, I create a page, but would not want to write a full infobox, but the subject has a wikidata, how do you link and infobox auto with their wikidata? Thanks. ATZNA 14:40, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm not even sure what a wikidata is.............? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:43, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata contains data of goals, matches, birth and data on subjects(persons), for example, here is a wikidata page of Ronaldo. Point is, in other wikipedians you can merge and link the infobox with wikidata to auto write and fill all catagories in infobox, would you know how to do this in wikipedia en as you have been here for a couple of years? ATZNA 14:45, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I'm not familiar with that at all -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:51, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Viktor Johansson (footballer), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page.  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding ((U|I dream of horses)) to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 21:23, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ATZNA! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 21:28, Tuesday, April 17, 2018 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Antonis Gioukoudis, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 05:04, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please read WP:Non-admin closure before attempting to close any more discussions. Only experienced editors should close discussions; three days on Wikipedia can barely be considered experienced. I'd recommend waiting at least a few months. --Paul_012 (talk) 10:52, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Paul_012:, Hope you're all well. - I have taken many guides and I understand your concern on this account but I have been familiar with wikipedia for months - Again: I still have things to learn but I feel I am at least ready for WP:Non-admin closure on subjects that are clear. All my results are very much care and is followed with wikipedia guidelines. When i do a keep or delete, I always have strongly firm strict lines on why it is. I go through all the requirements Thanks. I understand your opinion. -- ATZNA 10:54, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not close deletion discussions that you have voted in. Doing so maybe considered disruptive. KingAndGod 14:00, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please DO NOT close non-old AfD as keep or speedy keep while AfD discussion has at least one !Delete vote, thanks! Non-old AfD means AfD discussion has ran less than 168 hours. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 14:17, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Usually AfD is closed by uninvolved editor unless your nomination is withdraw. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 14:19, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Hhhhhkohhhhh: Hi, I have never(I have closed 1 earlier than 168 hours where 1 !delete vote was input) closed an AfD where 1 or more delete !votes have been placed, all my cloings are on AfDs whom passes criteria for Speedy Delete or an AfD who has gone through a 7-day procces and reached a clear result via per a req. Thanks. ATZNA 14:28, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Because I saw you close this, so I want to let you know, we can't close AfD because this AfD has a !delete vote and under 168 hours.

BTW, you can use ((ping|Hhhhhkohhhhh)) or ((u|Hhhhhkohhhhh)) to ping me. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 14:39, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers @Hhhhhkohhhhh: Yes pal that is the one and only 1 I did and the one I was referring to. Again my apologies. I thought it had passed 7 days. ATZNA 14:46, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Our speedy delete policy, please see:WP:CSD, thanks! Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 14:22, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Hhhhhkohhhhh: Thanks for the link, I'll have a shortcut on my talk page now. Cheers. ATZNA 14:24, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

ATZNA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please - I have not created an account for months now, all my edits are patrolling and helping the community, I have even closed 2 AfDs and helped with many, I have also created and edited many articles. Please do not let something I did 2-3 months ago give me a block today - I was hoping to edit this moring but I see I know have a block.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

((Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Please - I have not created an account for months now, all my edits are patrolling and helping the community, I have even closed 2 AfDs and helped with many, I have also created and edited many articles. Please do not let something I did 2-3 months ago give me a block today - I was hoping to edit this moring but I see I know have a block. |3 = ~~~~))

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting ((subst:Decline reason here)) with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

((unblock reviewed |1=Please - I have not created an account for months now, all my edits are patrolling and helping the community, I have even closed 2 AfDs and helped with many, I have also created and edited many articles. Please do not let something I did 2-3 months ago give me a block today - I was hoping to edit this moring but I see I know have a block. |decline = ((subst:Decline reason here)) ~~~~))

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

((unblock reviewed |1=Please - I have not created an account for months now, all my edits are patrolling and helping the community, I have even closed 2 AfDs and helped with many, I have also created and edited many articles. Please do not let something I did 2-3 months ago give me a block today - I was hoping to edit this moring but I see I know have a block. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~))