Hello, Activ9, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place ((help me)) before the question. Again, welcome! Viriditas (talk) 06:40, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Non violent direct action in Australia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non violent direct action in Australia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 07:45, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to Internet activism. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Please stop spamming Aidan Ricketts. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 22:46, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I am writing this as the author of the entries being criticised. Hi i am not sure what part of my entries in internet activism you are concerned about. The text itself is genuine and constructive and i dont expect theres a problem with the nature of the text i added. I left existing information in place, added new perspectives and information where appropariate and referecned it. So I am assuming that what you are calling 'promotion' refers to the fact that the references contained hyperlinks to the author site where it is also possible to obtain the book rferred to. If this is not allowable id be happy to remove the hyperlinks, but leave the contributions to the article and the references in place. I had not thought that it would be problematic for readers to be able to click on a hyperlink that would allow them to access the sources referred to, Im sure many hyperlinks to articles and sites have this capability. Activ9 (talk) 02:55, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]