please see new edits added to the talk page at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:93.140.16.202 v/r — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.140.16.202 (talk) 21:07, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I've been impressed with the quality of your work recently and would like to request your help in creating an article on 6-time Brazilian jiu Jitsu world champion Paulo Sergio Santos. I've filed the request for an article under Sports -> martial arts in requests, but I was wondering if you'd have the time to help kick it off and create the initial page? In the request, there are several useful links including: https://www.instagram.com/paulosergiobjj/?hl=en https://www.bjjheroes.com/bjj-fighters/paulo-sergio https://www.bjjee.com/interview/highest-ranked-black-belt-in-france-paulo-sergio-santos-we-must-be-an-example-for-our-students/ http://www.psphoenixbjj.com/?page_id=6 https://www.amazon.com/Brazilian-Jiu-Jitsu-Alliance-Standing-Techniques/dp/B00EWJ407Y I would write it myself, but I have a conflict of interest since I have trained with him before and therefore I'm not impartial.

Thank you, BasicsOnly — Preceding unsigned comment added by BasicsOnly (talk • contribs) 23:19, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@BasicsOnly: Hello, thanks for getting in touch - and thanks especially for disclosing your conflict of interest. Unfortunately I'm not sure this is something I can do - I don't have any knowledge about martial arts and I don't speak Portuguese. Maybe you could look for someone suitable at Wikipedia:WikiProject Martial arts? I hope you succeed! Best wishes, Akakievich (talk) 23:33, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The idea of the news site being far right was not exactly proven as you could check the entry on mediabiasfactcheck.com, and the use who created the thing may probably had some left wing bias, as he did not get consensus on the talk page either. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ABruhRandomUser (talk • contribs) 21:35, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ABruhRandomUser: The reason you are asked to get consensus is because this has been controversial in the past, and the wording "far right" is what was settled on. There are five sources supporting this claim. If you do want to change it, you're within your rights to try and do that, but doing it via an edit war is destructive to Wikipedia. All the best, Akakievich (talk) 21:40, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ok man — Preceding unsigned comment added by ABruhRandomUser (talk • contribs) 15:36, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your wasting your time aka is a lefty simp — Preceding unsigned comment added by RealOkoru (talk • contribs) 22:59, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very sorry but I'm not sure what you are talking about. Regards, Akakievich (talk) 23:03, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169 Online events: New: Pride / United Nations / Geofocus on reducing gender imbalance Continuing initiatives: #1day1woman / Sports Help us plan future events: Virtual Ideas Cafe Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 17:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Tigre community and I are trying to tell the general history of the Tigre people, written and told by Tigres themselves. However, astonishing set of claims on the Tigre people page. Set of ideology, a mixture of just cherry-picked quotes facts and figures self serving, selective, a farrago of distortions, misrepresentations, misinterpretations, putting forward these sweeping opinions.

I'm following the trail of evidence on the Tigre people's religion, traditions and accustoms, using trusted sources from academics and using reliable citations. They are falsifying the history, using eloquent language to change peoples thoughts, trying to cause confusion on the reality. The Tigre people are defenceless people like many communities in Eritrea.

I tried showing the melting pot that has existed in Eritrea over the centuries because of its very strategic location on the Red Sea which made it significant in anciet times using BBC sites and video clips as referencing but got deleted by marauding group supporting the current Eritrean government known internationally for his poor human rights record in Eritrea and across the region, which I don't need to say, everyone knows. Wikipedia should be calling these user accounts for accountability and to use referencing and citation.

The Tigre people and other communities have illustrious history unknown to some due to the users inaccurate opinion of things. They need to stop combining everyone into one ideology which is not right anyway. They're saying because we're saying we are Eritrean that this is what we want, which is not true. There are other perspectives not just theirs. They're trying to split hair here.

The Tigre, Bilen, Saho, Afar, Beja and Rashida pages are being distorted. We reference our reports, they dont. We trust our sources of information.

The reality is the users are supporting a well known and understood regime that don't accept Muslim Eritreans despite making 50% of the population.

Isais Awferki's hand picked by the Ethiopians and is not a true representation of the public. Muslims and Christian Eritreans get along its just the government. Please dont give them platform to impose their opinion of things.

There is a real solitary amongst all Eritreans and the international community. Both Christian and Muslims know enough to reject this bluff. Christians are also being persecuted. Please stop the users (Awferki's allies) from imposing this dishonest, offensive ideology. They have an amnesiac streak when it comes to acknowledging the immigrant blood in their veins. Due to the strategic position of the country, many ancient civilisations came and mixed with the pre-existing population. Period.

With all due respect

LegacyVisual LegacyVisual (talk) 19:31, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Akakievich! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:10, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Explain why you are frequently putting inaccurate opinions on the Tigre page LegacyVisual (talk) 20:06, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Tigre community and I are trying to tell the general history of the Tigre people, written and told by Tigres themselves. However, astonishing set of claims on the Tigre people page. Set of ideology, a mixture of just cherry-picked quotes facts and figures self serving, selective, a farrago of distortions, misrepresentations, misinterpretations, putting forward these sweeping opinions.

I'm following the trail of evidence on the Tigre people's religion, traditions and accustoms, using trusted sources from academics and using reliable citations. They are falsifying the history, using eloquent language to change peoples thoughts, trying to cause confusion on the reality. The Tigre people are defenceless people like many communities in Eritrea.

I tried showing the melting pot that has existed in Eritrea over the centuries because of its very strategic location on the Red Sea which made it significant in anciet times using BBC sites and video clips as referencing but got deleted by marauding group supporting the current Eritrean government known internationally for his poor human rights record in Eritrea and across the region, which I don't need to say, everyone knows. Wikipedia should be calling these user accounts for accountability and to use referencing and citation.

The Tigre people and other communities have illustrious history unknown to some due to the users inaccurate opinion of things. They need to stop combining everyone into one ideology which is not right anyway. They're saying because we're saying we are Eritrean that this is what we want, which is not true. There are other perspectives not just theirs. They're trying to split hair here.

The Tigre, Bilen, Saho, Afar, Beja and Rashida pages are being distorted. We reference our reports, they dont. We trust our sources of information.

The reality is the users are supporting a well known and understood regime that don't accept Muslim Eritreans despite making 50% of the population.

Isais Awferki's hand picked by the Ethiopians and is not a true representation of the public. Muslims and Christian Eritreans get along its just the government. Please dont give them platform to impose their opinion of things.

There is a real solitary amongst all Eritreans and the international community. Both Christian and Muslims know enough to reject this bluff. Christians are also being persecuted. Please stop the users (Awferki's allies) from imposing this dishonest, offensive ideology. They have an amnesiac streak when it comes to acknowledging the immigrant blood in their veins. Due to the strategic position of the country, many ancient civilisations came and mixed with the pre-existing population. Period.

With all due respect

LegacyVisual LegacyVisual (talk) 19:33, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the demographic population abroad, how were they able to verify them all as Eritreans of Tigrinya orgin? There are tens of thousands of non-Tigrinya Eritreans living in the western countries stop generalizing all Eritreans into one Ethnic group. This is a dishonest, offensive ideology and very nationalistic — Preceding unsigned comment added by LegacyVisual (talk • contribs) 20:18, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]