Hello, Amost42n81, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -- Kndimov (talk) 03:18, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kevin O'Leary has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:31, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:33, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello Amost42n81,
There has been an edit war on the Kevin O'Leary page. Korny has tried to edit war in a large section about Donald Trump. OntarioTeacher has been mass reverting Korny's changes due to claims that it is ideologically biased, intended to be harmful to O'Leary's reputation, and contains loaded language. There are even grammatical errors such as a large run-on-sentence, that Korny denies exists, even though it has over 50 words and 6 clauses. Korny has been edit warring in pretty much the same massive paragraph on a daily basis for the past 2 months despite numerous objections on the talk page from many different editors. Some of the proposed changes are non-controversial, however. So, I have attempted to propose a compromise that omits some of Korny's more controversial statements, while retaining the parts that are relatively benign. We keep asking Korny to try a smaller edit, and/or only add the parts which have consensus, however these requests have fallen on deaf ears. Care to comment on the talk page? I'm asking you because you have edited the O'Leary article in the past, and you are an uninvolved editor. MohammedMohammedمحمد 04:21, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andrei Kozitsyn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sambo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:06, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HCA Healthcare, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TXU (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muslim World League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Economic and Social Council.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin D. Maddox until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
SmartSE (talk) 14:02, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello Amost42n81. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Amost42n81. The template ((Paid)) can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: ((paid|user=Amost42n81|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName))
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. SmartSE (talk) 14:03, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. The page User:Amost42n81/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 05:36, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Connor O'Brien (alpine skier), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connor O'Brien (alpine skier) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 12 March 2024 (UTC)