This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 55 | ← | Archive 57 | Archive 58 | Archive 59 | Archive 60 | Archive 61 | → | Archive 65 |
Replied at Talk:UBC (disambiguation)#Revisit whether UBC should point to UBC (disambiguation) page or University of British Columbia as primary topic. No need copy the discussion in multiple places -- a simple notification is sufficient. older ≠ wiser 18:35, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
I have opened a new RFC at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style § RFC: Proposed amendment to MOS:COMMA regarding geographical references and dates. —sroc 💬 08:32, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Hey, (first, I want to state that I hope I don't step on toes) but I just wanted to let you know that I changed back those dab's that you reverted as the fact that they have a red link is not a reason to revert. If you check out the disambiguation page here it states,
It may contain red links to help editors create articles on notable entries.
you will note that red links are ok as they increase the chance that the "red link" article will get created if someone sees that, otherwise it may never get created. Thanks for your fastidiousness regardless of the outcome. speednat (talk) 22:36, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Exile (disambiguation) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:53, 11 November 2013 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Reunion may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:35, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to MOS may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:04, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Tommy_Pinball reported by User:Obiwankenobi (Result: ). I have added your name Tommy Pinball (talk) 17:45, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
I would like to know why you are deleting the stayfree content ??
please can you tell me why you are deleting the content of Stayfree page .Are you working for Johnson and Johnson??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Getdpg (talk • contribs) 14:39, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Stayfree is Johnson and Johnson product it is not marketed under McNeil-PPC . They don't write anywhere about McNeil-PPC . Please can you put the reference . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Getdpg (talk • contribs) 05:20, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi Bkonrad, thanks for fixing the title capitalization of Li Surname (郦). Could you please further move the article to Li (surname 郦), as "surname" should be part of the disambiguator, like all other surname articles. I tried to do it myself but for some reason it's on the title blacklist. Thanks! -Zanhe (talk) 19:53, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi! You're being spammed because you've participated in the move discussion at Talk:Parkside Avenue (BMT Brighton Line)#Requested move. I'm seeking input for a broader policy solution to US station name articles at User:Mackensen/Naming conventions (US stations) and I hope that you'll participate there. Best, Mackensen (talk) 01:04, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Older Bkonrad wiser. Regarding this comment that "text between the TOC and first section risks being inaccessible", how so? It's not that I doubt you assertion, but I would like to understand it. Is it perhaps a technical issue, or an issue of typical reader behavior? Cnilep (talk) 03:34, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
On November 28th 2013, the links with the article "Huron" (disambiguation) were canceled on English articles whose title includes the word "Huron". There is certainly a good intention behind that action. Put in perpectives, that these links to disambiguation article may seem unnecessary to some people, but very useful for others.
On Wikipedia, desambiguation articles and links in the related articles help greatly users to navigate in this ocean of information. Homonym articles help particularly to understand the origin of the name or toponyms, and their interrelation. The word "Huron" is commonly used in many designations.
In my contribution to Wikipedia, much effort has been invested to make connections with disambiguation pages in different languages. It is regrettable that these links with English article "Huron" (disambiguation) have been deleted in related articles. Against my proposal is to restore these links with the English article "Huron" (disambiguation). Thanks to reconsider this initiative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Veillg1 (talk • contribs) 14:28, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Have you seen where that link leads?...to the Oxford University Press article, where the journal isn't even mentioned! What is anyone going to get out of that? In fact, I've nominated that redirect for deletion. WQUlrich (talk) 20:42, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Did you even open up the talk page? Cheers. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 15:16, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Drum (disambiguation) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:36, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to PDB may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:57, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ham (disambiguation) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:56, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Naif (disambiguation) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:52, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Walt may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:37, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sog may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:26, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Maria may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:24, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi, what's the purpose for [1]? Legoktm (talk) 04:40, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names)#En dash vs. "and" for multi-state metro areas. Herostratus (talk) 18:18, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, i have been noticing that you are deleting my edits on the page ISD, i wrote International School of Dongguan, run by International School Services, you later deleted it and changed it to QSI, i know that the school QSI in dongguan exists, because i have been in it for 2 years, but there is another school called ISD run by International School Services that i am currently in, it does exist, i hope that you don't delete it because i am sure it exists, i am currently in this school. This is my fourth year living in dongguan, and i have spent all these 4 years in international schools, i know every international school in dongguan. If you don't believe this school exists, heres the website: www.i-s-d.org Also, Quality School International is QSI, and should be put under the page QSI, and not the page ISD. thank you for taking your time to read this message, i hope you can understand what i am trying to say here. Yours truly
Longseeyes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Longseeyes (talk • contribs) 10:58, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
ok, sorry about that, ill check to see if a page could be made, perhaps you could help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Longseeyes (talk • contribs) 11:14, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
opps, i found why all my links are red, the organization i was linking too was International Schools Services, but the first time, i wrote it as International School Services, without the s behind school, anyway, i have changed the problem, and it now as a blue link, this that acceptable? thanks!
Longseeyes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Longseeyes (talk • contribs) 11:25, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
I think that if i can somehow add a link to the school's website, i can solve that problem, thing is, i am fairly new as a wikipedia editor, and I don't know how to add references, can you help me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Longseeyes (talk • contribs) 11:39, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi B, Re this edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=TBB&diff=585849952&oldid=585848314 , are you aware that the example in MOS:DABORDER shows the miscellaneous entries near the top of the page rather than in a "Other" section? (I only realised that when one of my edits was reverted). Maybe that part of the MOS should be changed, but, in the meantime, W's restructuring is actually correct. However, the rest of what W's doing is clearly a problem. As (s)he's continuing after a talk page message and what must by now be a large number of reversions I'm wondering whether something like WP:RFC/U might be appropriate. DexDor (talk) 06:07, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from removing page content unless the content violates the rules\regulations of wikipedia or is done with poor taste and lowers the quality of the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joshuay04 (talk • contribs) 13:19, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cell and Molecular Biology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello BKonrad, you've demaged this site on Dec. 20. Greetings -- Werddemer (talk) 11:26, 22 December 2013 (UTC)