This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 70 | ← | Archive 75 | Archive 76 | Archive 77 | Archive 78 | Archive 79 | Archive 80 |
The article Willem Mulder (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 24.205.24.240 (talk) 02:09, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello. I have reverted this edit of yours from 2014. Just to explain why, you state in your edit summary "(WP:IMOS states "any alternative name for the locale should be provided on the first line of the article (whether or not the name is widely used)", however as one of the chief architects of the WP:IMOS policy on this issue I must state that your reasoning is inherently wrong. Please see the bullet points of Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Ireland-related_articles#Other_names which explains the protocol. As Gilford is in Northern Ireland and derives from English, not Irish, then the Irish and any other forms are to be included only in the infobox. Mabuska (talk) 23:48, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I have re-added Super Mario the wrestler to list, why did you remove it? Only one blue link is needed, wrestler does exist and wrestled in the USWA which at one time was the third biggest wrestling organization in the u.s., so that is what I have changed the blue link to. Though I think independent wrestling was fine though, shouldn't it be? You can check Wikia to find information on Super Mario.
Davidgoodheart (talk) 06:35, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
What linked article do you mean? Look up super mario in the link provided below. What kind of info is needed in order for it to be added to list? Is This link here is good enough to show that it should be added to list? http://www.cagematch.net/?id=2&nr=10915&page=4
Davidgoodheart (talk) 16:07, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, if super mario was mentioned in the uswa linked article, then could super mario be added to the list? Davidgoodheart (talk) 16:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello,
Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I know they are instances of the primary topic but they are based upon real people playing those characters, so they should definitly be included Davidgoodheart (talk) 21:27, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Bkonrad.
A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.
It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.
If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Why did you delete my addition from the disambiguation page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A03F:2AF2:5100:1D74:588:FCFE:3B1B (talk) 14:18, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Unfortunately, you have reverted my removal on a section of Chinese cartoons in Root (disambiguation), but the so called Chinese cartoon is irrelevant to the subject of plant roots. I would rather leave a comment than start an edit war, thankfully.
Facements (talk) 19:59, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Facements
Hi, would it be okay to add wonder Woman to the woman disambiguation page?
Davidgoodheart (talk) 21:56, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I don't understand unambiguous partial title matches, why it that when I added the New York dolls to the doll page, it is not unambiguous partial title, but when I added spider woman and wonder woman to the woman page it is? Or why when I added the people playing Mario to the Mario page it was okay, but I couldn't do the same with the Luigi page? and why do you except red bull and not red robin? These things are kind of puzzling
Davidgoodheart (talk) 03:26, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Bonkrad, please check out the War (disambiguation) and trouble disambiguation pages and my recent edits. since MC Trouble, Bruno Troublé and The War Song are included on those pages I think my edits should be there too, what do you think?
Davidgoodheart (talk) 21:44, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Yes I know, but are they going to be allowed to be kept? I see you haven't changed them, if you do change them are you going to things on the pages that might be partial as well?
Davidgoodheart (talk) 22:47, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Bkonrad. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.
Hello, Bkonrad. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi! About this: [1], [2], [3]. I can't really agree with the deletion of the links. I personally need them as a reader. And as an editor. Cause after reading about something in another language I may want to create an Enwiki article for it. Now no one will see the pages in Spanish and Portuguese and no one will ever translate them.
By the way, there is even a special template template for this, ((Template:Interlanguage link)). --Moscow Connection (talk) 14:00, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Okay, I've just noticed you've already added the interlanguage link to the "List of films": [4]... (I went there to add it and it was already there.) But still, it's only one. There were two more and they were very convenient for readers. Think about it... What's best for Wikipedia? Poor links or no links at all? (I don't really think they are poor. It's just that you said it was not done like that for some reason. Could you please point me to the rule that says it is not done?) --Moscow Connection (talk) 14:07, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Why did you do this: [5]? Why are you edit warring about something unimportant like this? I simply forgot to add a description. Here, I fixed it: [6]. By the way, there is a page for the album in Portuguese: [7], and now I can't link it. Would you please show me the rule that says not to add interlanguage links to disambuguation pages? --Moscow Connection (talk) 15:08, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi Bkonrad, about the Red (disambiguation) page, what should go under people red and nickname red, should it be the exact same thing? Please check out my recent edits and see if there are correctly done, and if they are not done right please explain the correct format. Hi Bkonrad, please check out the Red disambiguation page.
Thanks for taking the time to review my edit and restore some of the information. I think it looks good now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edaham (talk • contribs) 03:33, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
I am completely perplexed by your insistence on having Thomas Jefferson and Otto von Bismarck at the very top of these disambiguation pages, despite the patent fact that these two persons are not WP:PRIMARYREDIRECTs. Why should we assume that readers are looking for the two men? If they both are really that likely to be the wanted page readers are looking for, they should merely be redirects. Having skimmed through WP:DAB, there is nothing condoning subjective opinion of editors wanting to place their selected primary topic on top of a disambiguation page without "(disambiguation)" in the title. If you really want these two statesmen at the top of their respective dabpages, then I suggest you open a move request at Talk:Jefferson and Talk:Bismarck. Thanks.--Nevé–selbert 23:21, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
In cases where a small number of main topics are significantly more likely to be the reader's target, several of the most common meanings may be placed at the top, with other meanings below. One is a small number, and discussion on the respoective talk pages has clearly established that these topics are significantly more likely to be the topic sought by are reader looking for those terms. older ≠ wiser 23:42, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Could you please open a move discussion on whether Jefferson should be moved to Jefferson (disambiguation)? Thanks.--Nevé–selbert 19:27, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
You've now removed the "disambiguation" template 5 times. Every time you do this, the article reappears in Cat:U and is there retagged as a dab page. Since this has now happened 5 times, please reach the obvious conclusion that you are not making your point adequately: rather than continuing, please just make whatever change you feel necessary, and save everybody's time. Eustachiusz (talk) 13:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Why did you revert my change to the Blue Room disambiguation page. Are you unaware that the link points back to the same page? What is the use of that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bgoldnyxnet (talk • contribs) 21:05, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello Bkonrad. Please feel free to comment on the move discussion at Talk:D'Israeli#Requested move 15 December 2016. Thank-you.--Nevé–selbert 21:31, 29 December 2016 (UTC)