Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Moonsoon has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. NorwegianBlue talk 20:09, 25 May 2009 (UTC) Warning struck out by NorwegianBlue talk, the edit was a beginner's mistake, and no attempt at vandalism. --NorwegianBlue talk 21:47, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
The page has now been moved back where it should be, thanks to Toon5, administrator. However, if I interpreted the sequence of events correctly, you
The edits you made after moving the contents without the history (boldfaced above), are lost, so you may want to look through the article, and redo the edits. Happy editing. --NorwegianBlue talk 21:43, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Somali people, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 15:05, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
"secondly, the presence of CRS mtDNA haplotypes (with different lengths of Cs at position 309) are typical European mtDNA haplotypes; thirdly, high frequencies of 146T–150C–152T (probe B1) and 189A–195T–198C–200A (probe C1) occur compared with other African populations”
One of your recent edits is being discussed here. DMacks (talk) 17:16, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Brout8, I'm looking forward to learning about more sources for mtDNA testing information than I now know about, as follows:
I believe your recent revision of the WP section mtDNA testing's basepair numbers was correct, judging by your total number 16569 in comparison with my only other (almost-)reliable source, mitomap.org, which listed the total as 16568 -- whereas the WP section previously had listed 16579. But for my own information, I would really like to know your source, so that I can be better-informed about mtDNA facts in the future. And you probably know your source offhand, for the above-mentioned basepair numbers.
So please tell me your source (here on your talk page or wherever you like), and I'll be glad to add the source reference information in that WP section, or just do it (add it) yourself. (I'll also duplicate your HVR1 and HVR2 ranges right with the coding region range in that WP section, to help the WP readers.) Gratefully and/or thankfully, For7thGen (talk) 22:28, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Macro-haplogroup L (mtDNA) is already merged with Haplogroup L (mtDNA). But what of both names are advisable in your opinion? --Maulucioni (talk) 15:12, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Could you explain this edit
Why did you move Somalis from L3a to L3x? Thank you in advance
Wadaad (talk) 18:22, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
I went back and checked the markers changes from the rCRS and compared them to the latest research on the Phylotree.org and none of the "Somali L3a" in Watson, 1997 are L3a. L3a requires the A16316G change. Several of the "L3a" were actually L2a. However, there were some L3. There were L3f1b, L3d, L3i, and L3x1. There probably are L3a Somalis but I have not seen the published samples yet. Watson's sample was somewhat small.
These are the Watson samples in current nomenclature and in order:
-- Brout8 (talk) 16:50, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Thank you, that makes sense.
Wadaad (talk) 03:38, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
The article has been reviewed and placed on hold pending improvement. WTF? (talk) 23:34, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed you are working on this in the E haplogroup, but I was surprised to see new names for the sub-clades under V13 for example. Has anyone proposed those names yet anywhere? L143 for example was an SNP whose discovery I know about first hand, but until now ISOGG has not included it on their webpage. I guess at least some will appear eventually, but someone has to say what order they'll be in.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 21:09, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Banu hoshech". The reason given for Banu hoshech's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts..."
Please review and comment:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_J1_(Y-DNA)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Haplogroup_J1_(Y-DNA)
JohnLloydScharf (talk) 23:33, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Good question. I am assuming User:Muntuwandi? I suppose you have seen the disruption at E-M215? It is remarkably similar to the one you are apparently having.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 22:53, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Haplogroup E-V38, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 22:43, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello. I quoted a reliable source for my edit. Did you miss it?---Now wiki (talk) 16:10, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Brout8. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Hello, Brout8. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Brout8. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Brout8, I hope you're still online. I don't want you to get caught up in this controversy. However, do you know who is also haplogroup E1b1a? Ramses III and his son. In fact the entire Amarna Dynasty has STRs that cluster closer to people in Southern Africa, the Great Lakes of Africa (Malawi, Tanzania) and Tropical West Africa today. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D-cdQZ1X4AAIXwB.jpg https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D-cdRgwXoAEEDzA.jpg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVAPMfP4pog&t=570 This information is still being kept off Wikipedia. Ramses III and STR profile http://www.dnatribes.com/dnatribes-digest-2013-02-01.pdf The other Amarna mummies (Tutankhamon, Amenhotep III, possibly Tiye and Akhnaton) http://dnatribes.com/dnatribes-digest-2012-01-01.pdf The statement that Ramses III has haplogroup E1b1a is in the BMJ. https://www.bmj.com/content/345/bmj.e8268 It is on the Ramses III page on Wikipedia, however you'd never know if you weren't looking for it. It is being obscured, and the STR profiles of the Amarna mummies is actively being kept off Wikipedia. 83.84.100.133 (talk) 15:32, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello Brout8:
Thank you for your contributions to veganism – or vegetarianism – related articles. I'd like to invite you to join WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a WikiProject to improve veganism and vegetarianism articles on Wikipedia and coverage of these topics. If you would like to participate or join, please visit the project page for more information. Thanks! Psychologist Guy (talk) 13:45, 25 July 2020 (UTC) |
---|
Stop deleting my edits. If you took the time to research point you would agree with me. There is diversity in Scotland — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wmcdonald19751975 (talk • contribs) 21:55, 21 January 2021 (UTC)